CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Anchor
Beechfield Lodge
232 Eccles Old Road, Salford, M6 8AG
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment and systems to manage risks such as falls, choking and skin breakdown. Medicines were generally managed safely, but there were some gaps in records for thickened fluids.
- Effective?
- Good
- Staff had relevant training, inductions, supervision and appraisals. People received support with nutrition, hydration, healthcare and decisions about their care.
- Caring?
- Good
- People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Inspectors saw caring interactions and found that people were supported to remain as independent as possible.
- Responsive?
- Good
- Care plans were personalised and included people's history, interests and preferences. Activities and regular trips took place, and there was a complaints process.
- Well-led?
- Good
- The home had a registered manager and systems for audits, meetings, surveys and staff checks. Inspectors found a positive culture and partnership working with health and social care professionals.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some gaps in records for thickened fluids.
The inspection was unannounced. Inspectors visited on 21 and 23 November 2023. They spoke with people living at the home, relatives and staff. They also checked care plans, recruitment files, training records and quality checks.
The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, suitable risk checks and good support with food, drink and healthcare.
People and relatives gave positive feedback. Inspectors saw kind interactions and found that care plans reflected people's needs and preferences. The home had activities, trips, complaints arrangements and systems for checking quality. The overall rating stayed Good, as it was at the previous inspection published in October 2017.
Enough staff
Inspectors found there were enough staff to meet people's needs safely. Recruitment checks, including references and DBS checks, were completed.
“The provider ensured there were enough staff employed to care for people safely.” from the report
Kind and respectful care
People and relatives spoke positively about the care. Inspectors observed staff treating people warmly and supporting their dignity and independence.
“During the inspection we observed staff interacting with people living at the home in kind and caring way.” from the report
Personalised support
Care plans included people's preferences, life histories and hobbies. Staff knew people's individual needs and how they preferred to receive support.
“Care plans were personalised and contained information for staff about how people wanted their care and support to be carried out.” from the report
Activities and trips
People could take part in a range of activities, with regular trips and outings. The report says these supported people's interests and social contact.
“There was a range of activities for people to take part in and trips out took place regularly.” from the report
Quality monitoring
Managers used audits, meetings, surveys and staff checks to monitor the service. The home also worked with health and social care professionals.
“There were systems in place to monitor the quality of service through audits, meetings, surveys and competency checks.” from the report
Gaps in thickened-fluid records
minorMedicine records were otherwise completed accurately, but inspectors found some gaps in records for thickened fluids. They raised this with the deputy and registered manager.
“although we found there were some gaps in records for thickened fluids.” from the report
- 01How do you make sure thickened fluids are recorded correctly every time?
- 02How would you assess and review my relative's risks, such as falls, choking or skin breakdown?
- 03What activities and trips would be suitable for my relative, and how often could they take part?
- 04How would my relative be involved in decisions about their care if they had difficulty communicating or making a decision?
- 05How do you use complaints, meetings and surveys to make changes to the home?
This was an unannounced inspection of the care provided and the premises, covering all five CQC questions; inspectors visited on 21 and 23 November, with inspection activity continuing until 5 December 2023. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Beechfield Lodge
3 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- October 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2014GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 November 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Anchor Hanover Group
120 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.