Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Runwood

Braywood Gardens

Millbrook Drive, Carlton, Nottingham, NG4 3SR

Goodpublished 14 February 2025, 18 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found risks with storage, windows, cleanliness, food safety and care records.

Inspectors visited unannounced on 30 October and 9 November 2023. They spoke with relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care records, medicines records, staff files and infection control arrangements.

They found several safety problems. Harmful products were not always locked away, some windows had no restrictors or risk assessments, and some people did not receive help promptly. Parts of the home were unclean, and food storage checks were not reliable.

The home had not always acted on accidents, incidents and previous checks. Care plans were not always updated. The overall rating fell from Good to Requires Improvement. The inspection was focused on Safe and Well-led, so the other ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Medicines

    Medicines were managed and administered safely. Staff had training and their competence had been checked.

    Staff had received training to safely administer medicines.from the report
  • Safeguarding

    Staff understood how to report suspected abuse. Relatives said they felt people were safe and knew who to contact with concerns.

    Relatives told us they felt their family members were safe.from the report
  • Listening to feedback

    Relatives were asked for their views through questionnaires, and the provider worked with external professionals and local safeguarding teams.

    Relatives told us they received questionnaires to offer their opinions about the service and express their views.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unsafe storage and windows

    serious

    Thickening powder and cleaning products could be accessed by people. Four first-floor windows could be opened fully without restrictors, and risks had not been assessed.

    Potentially harmful products were not always stored securely.from the report
  • Cleanliness and food safety

    serious

    Some furniture and cushions were dirty or stained, and kitchenettes were not thoroughly clean. Opened food was not always labelled and fridge temperature records were unreliable.

    People were at risk of infection.from the report
  • Delays in support

    needs fixing

    Inspectors saw people waiting for help, including help after using a call button and support to go to the toilet.

    Staff were not always prompt in providing support to people.from the report
  • Care records and improvement systems

    serious

    Accident and incident information was not always used to update care plans. The provider's systems did not consistently ensure that safety actions were completed and sustained.

    The provider did not always use information from incident and accident reports to update care plans.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How have you secured thickening powder, cleaning products and other potentially harmful items?
  2. 02Have all window risks been assessed, and are restrictors now fitted wherever needed?
  3. 03How do you check that communal areas, furniture, cushions and kitchenettes remain clean?
  4. 04How are opened foods labelled and fridge temperatures checked when equipment is faulty?
  5. 05How have you improved response times to call bells and requests for help, and how do you monitor this?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the Effective, Caring and Responsive ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Braywood Gardens

7 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. December 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Braywood Gardens

  2. April 2023Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. May 2021Goodup from Inadequate
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2020Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2019Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: InadequateResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. March 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 29 March 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Runwood Homes Limited

56 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Park View

Witham, CM8
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Park View

Warwick, CV34
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Highview Lodge

Hemel Hempstead, HP1
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 13 months agoReport explained

Maun View

Mansfield, NG19
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 18 months agoReport explained

Ashwood - Ware

Ware, SG12
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 8 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Nottingham

Oakleigh Lodge

Nottingham, NG3 · 0.8 km
Good
Residential
Rated 16 months agocare home

Prospect House

Nottingham, NG3 · 1.3 km
Not yet rated
Residential
Not yet ratedcare home

Fairview

Nottingham, NG3 · 1.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 9 months agocare home

Lynton House

Nottingham, NG3 · 1.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home