CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Potensial
Middleton Lodge
Station Road, Middleton St George, Darlington, DL2 1JA
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, October 2023
Middleton Lodge rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious problems with safety, records and management despite some recent improvements.
Inspectors visited on three days in July, including two unannounced visits. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and visiting professionals. They reviewed care files, medicines records, incident reports, training records and quality checks.
The home was not safe. Equipment was not always checked, care plans and risk assessments were out of date, and medicines guidance and records were incomplete. Infection control checks also missed dirty and rusty bath chairs.
The home had caring staff and staffing had become more consistent. People were accessing the community more, and the garden had improved. However, care was not always based on people's current needs, preferences or goals, and staff training and supervision were not consistently up to date.
The overall rating fell from Requires Improvement to Inadequate. The home is in special measures, so CQC will keep it under review and normally re-inspect within six months unless it takes other action.
More consistent staffing
Agency use had reduced significantly in the two months before the inspection. This helped staff know people better, although relatives still reported a lack of continuity.
“The use of agency staff had significantly decreased in the last 2 months.” from the report
Kind relationships
People generally appeared happy and relaxed with staff. Relatives gave mixed feedback overall but were positive about staff being caring.
“People told us they were happy with the support they received and had a good relationship with the staff who supported them.” from the report
Improved garden
The outdoor area had been made more accessible, including for people who used wheelchairs, to support independence.
“The garden area had been made accessible to those in wheelchairs to promote people's independence.” from the report
Acting manager's approach
The acting manager was open about the problems and was taking action, including arranging additional training and making safeguarding referrals when concerns came to light.
“The acting manager was honest and open with us during the inspection.” from the report
Unsafe equipment and risk checks
seriousHoist slings were not routinely checked and some could not be used because their instructions had been washed off. One person stayed in bed for two days as a result.
“One person had to remain in bed for 2 days as staff had not routinely checked slings used to hoist them.” from the report
Medicines records
seriousInstructions and records for creams and medicines taken when needed were incomplete. This created a risk that medicines would not be given consistently or their effects properly reviewed.
“Guidance and records were not always in place to support the safe administration of topical medicines.” from the report
Out-of-date care information
seriousCare plans and risk assessments did not always change when people's needs changed. The new electronic care plan was better, but still needed to be introduced and embedded for everyone.
“Care plans and risk assessments were not always updated after someone's needs changed.” from the report
Weak management checks
seriousThe home did not have effective systems to monitor medicines, risks, incidents, records and overall quality. Some notifiable events had also not been reported to CQC.
“An effective quality monitoring system was still not fully in place.” from the report
Privacy and dignity
needs fixingInspectors heard staff discussing people's toilet use in front of others. Some records were also left on a kitchen worktop, and one person's preferred name was not used.
“We did observe some staff openly talking about taking people to the toilet and that they were still on the toilet in front of other staff and people using the service” from the report
- 01Have all people's care plans and risk assessments been updated, and how do you check staff are following them?
- 02What changes have been made to medicines guidance, records and checks since the inspection?
- 03Have all hoist slings and other equipment been checked, labelled and provided with clear instructions?
- 04Which staff training and supervision requirements were outstanding, and have they now been completed?
- 05What quality checks are now in place for incidents, safeguarding, infection control and management oversight?
This inspection assessed all five CQC key questions and included infection prevention and control; inspectors also continued gathering information from staff, relatives and professionals until 13 July 2023. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Middleton Lodge
6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.
- October 2023Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- January 2023Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- November 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- January 2019Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- July 2017Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2016Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- August 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- April 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- August 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 28 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Potensial Limited
22 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.