Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Potensial

Middleton Lodge

Station Road, Middleton St George, Darlington, DL2 1JA

Goodpublished 8 August 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2023

Middleton Lodge rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious problems with safety, records and management despite some recent improvements.

Inspectors visited on three days in July, including two unannounced visits. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and visiting professionals. They reviewed care files, medicines records, incident reports, training records and quality checks.

The home was not safe. Equipment was not always checked, care plans and risk assessments were out of date, and medicines guidance and records were incomplete. Infection control checks also missed dirty and rusty bath chairs.

The home had caring staff and staffing had become more consistent. People were accessing the community more, and the garden had improved. However, care was not always based on people's current needs, preferences or goals, and staff training and supervision were not consistently up to date.

The overall rating fell from Requires Improvement to Inadequate. The home is in special measures, so CQC will keep it under review and normally re-inspect within six months unless it takes other action.

What inspectors praised
  • More consistent staffing

    Agency use had reduced significantly in the two months before the inspection. This helped staff know people better, although relatives still reported a lack of continuity.

    The use of agency staff had significantly decreased in the last 2 months.from the report
  • Kind relationships

    People generally appeared happy and relaxed with staff. Relatives gave mixed feedback overall but were positive about staff being caring.

    People told us they were happy with the support they received and had a good relationship with the staff who supported them.from the report
  • Improved garden

    The outdoor area had been made more accessible, including for people who used wheelchairs, to support independence.

    The garden area had been made accessible to those in wheelchairs to promote people's independence.from the report
  • Acting manager's approach

    The acting manager was open about the problems and was taking action, including arranging additional training and making safeguarding referrals when concerns came to light.

    The acting manager was honest and open with us during the inspection.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unsafe equipment and risk checks

    serious

    Hoist slings were not routinely checked and some could not be used because their instructions had been washed off. One person stayed in bed for two days as a result.

    One person had to remain in bed for 2 days as staff had not routinely checked slings used to hoist them.from the report
  • Medicines records

    serious

    Instructions and records for creams and medicines taken when needed were incomplete. This created a risk that medicines would not be given consistently or their effects properly reviewed.

    Guidance and records were not always in place to support the safe administration of topical medicines.from the report
  • Out-of-date care information

    serious

    Care plans and risk assessments did not always change when people's needs changed. The new electronic care plan was better, but still needed to be introduced and embedded for everyone.

    Care plans and risk assessments were not always updated after someone's needs changed.from the report
  • Weak management checks

    serious

    The home did not have effective systems to monitor medicines, risks, incidents, records and overall quality. Some notifiable events had also not been reported to CQC.

    An effective quality monitoring system was still not fully in place.from the report
  • Privacy and dignity

    needs fixing

    Inspectors heard staff discussing people's toilet use in front of others. Some records were also left on a kitchen worktop, and one person's preferred name was not used.

    We did observe some staff openly talking about taking people to the toilet and that they were still on the toilet in front of other staff and people using the servicefrom the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have all people's care plans and risk assessments been updated, and how do you check staff are following them?
  2. 02What changes have been made to medicines guidance, records and checks since the inspection?
  3. 03Have all hoist slings and other equipment been checked, labelled and provided with clear instructions?
  4. 04Which staff training and supervision requirements were outstanding, and have they now been completed?
  5. 05What quality checks are now in place for incidents, safeguarding, infection control and management oversight?

This inspection assessed all five CQC key questions and included infection prevention and control; inspectors also continued gathering information from staff, relatives and professionals until 13 July 2023. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Middleton Lodge

6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. October 2023Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Middleton Lodge

  2. January 2023Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. June 2016Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. October 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. August 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. September 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. August 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 28 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Potensial Limited

22 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Park View

Salford, M6
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Parkside Lodge

Gateshead, NE8
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Kensington Hall

South Hetton, DH6
Good
Residential
Rated 7 months agoReport explained
Nearby

Other care homes near Darlington

Oak Lodge

Darlington, DL1 · 3.9 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Eastbourne Care Home

Darlington, DL1 · 4.1 km
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated 11 months agocare home