CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Welltower
Mercia Grange
538 Lichfield Road, Four Oaks, Sutton Coldfield, B74 4EH
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found that risks were assessed, safeguarding systems were in place, medicines were generally given safely, and staff recruitment checks had been completed. Infection prevention arrangements were also found to be satisfactory.
- Effective?
- Good
- People received support from trained staff, had enough food and drink, and were helped to access healthcare. Some best-interest records did not clearly show that relatives or advocates had been involved.
- Caring?
- Good
- This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. The report says the rating from the previous inspection was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. The report says the rating from the previous inspection was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Requires improvement
- The management team was approachable and staff felt supported, but quality checks were not reliable enough. Records about incidents, care and medicines were sometimes inconsistent, and prompt corrective action was not always taken.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Mercia Grange is Rated Good overall; inspectors found safe, effective and caring support, but governance and record checks require improvement.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 17 October 2023. Inspectors spoke with 11 people, 16 relatives and 9 staff. They reviewed care, medicines, recruitment and management records, including eight people's care records.
People were generally kept safe. Staff understood safeguarding and people's risks, medicines were usually administered safely, and staffing and recruitment checks were appropriate. People received support with food, healthcare and activities, and staff knew their preferences.
The main weakness was management oversight. Some accident, incident, care and medicines records were inconsistent, and action was not always taken quickly when problems were found. The overall rating changed from Outstanding at the previous inspection to Good. The well-led rating was Requires Improvement.
People felt safe
Staff understood safeguarding and people's risks. Inspectors found that risk assessments gave staff clear instructions for keeping people safe.
“People were protected from potential abuse by staff who had regular safeguarding training and knew about the different types of abuse.” from the report
Food and drink
People had choices and enough food and drink during the day. Inspectors found that people enjoyed the food.
“People had choices and access to sufficient food and drink throughout the day. Food was well presented, and people we spoke with told us they enjoyed it.” from the report
Staff training
Staff had completed relevant training, inductions and shadowing. Relatives told inspectors they were confident staff had the skills to meet people's needs.
“New staff had completed an induction programme which involved training and shadowing more experienced staff members.” from the report
Personalised environment
The home had different spaces for activities, family visits and privacy. Bedrooms and dementia areas were adapted to people's preferences and needs.
“People's bedrooms were decorated and furnished to meet their personal tastes and preferences, for example having family photographs and artwork.” from the report
Quality checks
seriousThe systems used to monitor quality and safety were not consistent enough. Some incidents were recorded or analysed incorrectly, which delayed a safeguarding referral.
“Audits undertaken in relation to accident and incidents required improvement to ensure the appropriate action had been completed.” from the report
Medicines records
seriousSome medicines records said medicines had not been given or were unavailable when they had actually been administered. Inspectors said this could lead to a missed dose or an extra dose.
“The incorrect recording on medicines documentation increases the risk people will not receive their medication or be given more than the prescribed amount.” from the report
Best-interest records
needs fixingSome records did not show that relatives or advocates had been involved in decisions for people assessed as lacking capacity. The manager said these records would be improved.
“Some people's best interest decision records did not always demonstrate people who were assessed as lacking capacity had their relatives or advocates involved in the decision-making process.” from the report
- 01What changes have you made to check that medicines records accurately show what was given?
- 02How do you make sure incident records are consistent and that safeguarding referrals are sent without delay?
- 03How are relatives or advocates involved in best-interest decisions, and where is this recorded?
- 04What recent audits can you show that demonstrate the identified record-keeping problems have been corrected?
- 05Which Caring and Responsive ratings were carried over from the previous inspection, and when will these areas next be assessed?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were used to calculate the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Mercia Grange
2 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has slipped, from Outstanding to Good.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingdown from OutstandingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- June 2019OutstandingSafe: GoodEffective: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding
- May 2018
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 31 May 2018.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Care UK Community Partnerships Ltd
105 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.