Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Achieve Together

Highbury House

36 Aston Road, Wem, Shrewsbury, SY4 5BA

Requires improvementpublished 26 July 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2023

Highbury House rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found unsafe staffing, weak risk management and ineffective leadership.

This was an unannounced focused inspection over 19, 21 and 25 July 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care files, medicines, training and safety records.

The home was rated Inadequate overall. Safe and well-led were rated Inadequate. Effective was rated Requires Improvement. Staffing levels were not always safe, agency staff affected consistency, and checks and incident reviews were not completed or effective.

Inspectors also found expired DoLS authorisations and could not find evidence that some restrictions had been agreed in people's best interests. Care plans were not always up to date, staff training had gaps, and access to activities and the community was limited.

The home had remained in breach of regulations since the previous inspection, when it was rated Requires Improvement. The provider had sent an action plan, but inspectors found that important improvements had not been made.

What inspectors praised
  • Access to healthcare

    People were supported to see healthcare professionals when they were unwell. Health action plans and hospital passports were also in place.

    People were supported to visit healthcare professionals when unwell.from the report
  • Staff awareness

    Regular staff had training to recognise and report abuse and said they would feel able to raise concerns.

    The regular staff on duty had been trained to recognise and report abuse.from the report
  • Personalised bedrooms

    Some bedrooms had been redecorated and reflected people's individual tastes. Refurbishment work was continuing in the properties.

    Some people's bedrooms had been redecorated and were personalised to people's individual taste.from the report
  • Everyday choices

    Staff were seen supporting people to make day-to-day decisions, including choices about where to go in the community.

    Staff were seen supporting people to make day to day decisions.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unsafe staffing levels

    serious

    Staffing levels were sometimes below the home's expected level. This meant some people's needs were prioritised and other people had less access to meaningful activities.

    There were insufficient numbers of suitably qualified and experienced staff being deployed to meet people's needs and mitigate any potential harm.from the report
  • Incidents and safeguarding

    serious

    There was a backlog of accident and incident reports. This meant the home could not be sure that possible abuse or repeated harm had been identified and acted on quickly.

    Robust procedures were not in place to ensure potential abuse was investigated and responded to in a timely manner.from the report
  • Risk and safety checks

    serious

    The home could not show that safety checks had been completed regularly or that actions from risk assessments had been dealt with. Some risk assessments were not updated after serious incidents.

    The new systems had not been implemented sufficiently to ensure health and safety risks were being mitigated.from the report
  • Restrictions and consent

    serious

    Several DoLS authorisations had expired. The home could not locate evidence that restrictions had been properly considered and agreed in people's best interests.

    People were subject to restrictions which could not be evidenced to be in their best interests.from the report
  • Out-of-date care information

    needs fixing

    Some care plans and behaviour support information were inaccurate or had not been updated after changes in training. This was particularly concerning because agency staff relied on the plans.

    People's needs were assessed, and care plans were in place, but it was evident that reviews and updates were required to ensure the information was accurate.from the report
  • Limited activities

    needs fixing

    Staffing problems and inconsistent support limited what some people could do. Community activities reduced during the pandemic and had not fully restarted.

    Community engagement decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic and had not been fully recommenced.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many permanent staff and agency staff are now working on each shift, and how do you ensure there are enough suitably trained staff?
  2. 02What has been done to clear the backlog of accident and incident reports, and how are safeguarding concerns now reviewed and referred?
  3. 03Have every person's DoLS authorisation, capacity assessment and best-interest decision been checked and renewed where needed?
  4. 04Which care plans and positive behaviour support plans have been updated, and how do you ensure agency staff follow the current information?
  5. 05What improvements have been made following the urgent action plan, including safety checks and community activities?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and the overall rating used the previous ratings for any questions not inspected. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Highbury House

4 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. October 2023Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Highbury House

  2. August 2022Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  4. October 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  5. July 2020

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 27 July 2020.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Achieve Together Limited

141 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Starboard House

Southampton, SO19
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agoReport explained

Ashford Lodge

Canterbury, CT4
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Ivers

Sturminster Newton, DT10
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agoReport explained

Homeleigh

Manchester, M8
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 21 months agoReport explained
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 3 years agoReport explained
Nearby

Other care homes near Shrewsbury

The Orchard

Shrewsbury, SY4 · 0.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Roseville House

Shrewsbury, SY4 · 0.5 km
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Walford Lodge

Shrewsbury, SY4 · 0.6 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Bowens Field

Shrewsbury, SY4 · 0.8 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home

Landona House

Shrewsbury, SY4 · 1.0 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home