Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Kingsley Healthcare

Downham Grange

Clackclose Road, Downham Market, PE38 9PA

Requires improvementpublished 25 July 2025, 13 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2023

Downham Grange rated Inadequate and placed in special measures after inspectors found unsafe care and serious management failures.

This was a focused inspection on 22 June and 4 July 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicine, staffing and management records.

They found serious safety problems. These included unclean areas, unsecured creams and personal care products, poor management of choking, pressure sore, food and fluid risks, missed or unavailable medicines, and staffing levels below the home's assessed needs.

Management checks were not finding or fixing important problems. There was no registered manager in post, and incidents were not always reported to the CQC or local authority. The home breached Regulations 12, 18 and 17.

The overall rating fell from Requires Improvement to Inadequate. The home was placed in special measures, which means the CQC will keep it under review and normally re-inspect within six months.

What inspectors praised
  • Fire and water safety checks

    Inspectors found that regular checks of fire safety equipment and legionella water safety were being completed.

    Regular checks of fire safety equipment, and legionella water safety checks were being completed.from the report
  • Mental capacity safeguards

    The home was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act, and required legal authorisations were in place where people were deprived of their liberty.

    We found the service was working within the principles of the MCA and if needed, appropriate legal authorisations were in place to deprive a person of their liberty.from the report
  • People and relatives could raise concerns

    People and relatives said they felt able to raise concerns. Inspectors also found that people and relatives were involved in developing care records.

    People and relatives told us they felt comfortable raising concerns or complaints with staff, and these would be responded to appropriately.from the report
  • Responsive staff interactions

    Inspectors saw staff respond to people who were upset or needed reassurance. Staff were also observed using reflective practice after incidents.

    We observed staff to be responsive to people for example if they were upset or needing reassurance.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unsafe medicines

    serious

    Medicines were sometimes out of stock or not given as prescribed. Records for creams and patch medicines had gaps, some creams were out of date, and some creams were not stored securely.

    People did not always receive their medicines as prescribed.from the report
  • Risks were not managed

    serious

    Choking, pressure sore, diabetes, food and fluid risks were poorly managed. Some people could access items that might harm them, including denture tablets, creams and personal care products.

    People, including those living with dementia were able to have unsupervised access to items such as denture cleaning tablets, drink thickener, razors and personal care products were not stored securely to protect them from harm.from the report
  • Poor cleanliness and basic care

    needs fixing

    Some areas and equipment were visibly dirty. Inspectors saw unclean fingernails, malodour in some bedrooms and gaps in records for nail and teeth cleaning.

    People's basic care needs were not met.from the report
  • Weak management oversight

    serious

    The provider's audits had identified some concerns but had not led to effective action. Notifiable incidents were not consistently reported, and there was no registered manager in post.

    The systems and processes to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service were not established or operated effectively to maintain standards and drive improvement at the service.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to ensure there are enough nurses and care staff on every shift, especially overnight?
  2. 02How do you now make sure medicines are available, given safely and recorded correctly, including creams and patch medicines?
  3. 03How are choking, pressure sore, diabetes, food and fluid risks now checked and acted on?
  4. 04What has been done to secure creams, denture cleaning tablets and other personal care products from people who may access them unsupervised?
  5. 05Who is currently responsible for management oversight, and what evidence can you show that audits now identify and fix care problems?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were not inspected and the overall rating was calculated using the previous inspection ratings. This explanation was written from the published report of 7 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Downham Grange

10 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. October 2023Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Downham Grange

  2. September 2022Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2021Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. August 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. March 2017Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. December 2016Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not ratedWell-led: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. August 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. February 2016Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. January 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  15. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  16. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  17. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  18. July 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  19. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Kingsley Care Homes Limited

7 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Allonsfield House

Woodbridge, IP13
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 17 months agoReport explained

Heron Lodge

Norwich, NR12
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 8 years agocare home

Kirkley Manor

Lowestoft, NR33
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home

Lynfield

Bungay, NR35
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 5 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Downham Market

High Haven

Downham Market, PE38 · 0.6 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home

Diamond House

Downham Market, PE38 · 0.8 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 8 years agocare home

Ashville House

Downham Market, PE38 · 1.0 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Victoria Hall

King'S Lynn, PE33 · 8.5 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home

Hickathrift House

Wisbech, PE14 · 10.8 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home