Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Kingsley Healthcare

Allonsfield House

Church Farm, Campsea Ashe, Woodbridge, IP13 0PX

Goodpublished 4 March 2025, 17 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2023

Allonsfield House was rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found safe and caring support, but activities, staffing deployment and management needed improvement.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 13 July 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care and meals, and checked care plans, medicines, recruitment, training and management records. They also spoke with relatives by telephone after the visit.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Caring. Medicines were managed safely, staff understood safeguarding, risks were recorded, and people were generally treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff had the training and skills needed, and people could make day-to-day choices about their care.

The home was rated Requires Improvement for Effective, Responsive and Well-led. People living with dementia were sometimes left without support or meaningful activity, and parts of the building and dining arrangements did not meet their needs well. Inspectors also found that staff were not always deployed effectively, wellbeing checks were not consistent, and quality checks had missed some problems.

The overall rating remained Requires Improvement, the same as at the previous inspection on 22 October 2022. Safe improved from Requires Improvement to Good, while Effective and Responsive fell from Good to Requires Improvement. Well-led remained Requires Improvement.

What inspectors praised
  • Medicines managed safely

    People received their medicines as prescribed. Staff were trained and assessed as competent, and time-specific medicines were given according to people's schedules.

    The services used an electronic medicines system. This was well managed, and people received their medicines when they should.from the report
  • Detailed care planning

    Care plans recorded people's needs, wishes, backgrounds and risks. People, relatives and other professionals were involved in assessments where appropriate.

    People's care plans were person centered and detailed the care and support they needed or preferred.from the report
  • Respect for privacy

    Inspectors saw that staff protected privacy during personal care, knocked before entering rooms and used people's preferred names.

    Bedroom doors were closed so that people were not observed when having personal care.from the report
  • Safeguarding and learning

    Staff knew how to report concerns. Incidents were investigated, reviewed and used to share learning across the provider's services.

    The provider had an electronic system to monitor incidents and ensure lessons were learnt and shared should a concern arise.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • People left without support

    needs fixing

    People in the dementia unit were left for lengthy periods without supervision or interaction, even though staff were nearby doing other tasks. Staff were also not always available in dining rooms.

    We observed lengthy periods of time when people in the dementia unit lounge had no supervision or interaction with staff, although staff were in the unit carrying out other tasks.from the report
  • Limited dementia activities

    needs fixing

    People living with advanced dementia or who were nonverbal were not consistently offered meaningful activities. Some were left to occupy themselves with repetitive or self-soothing actions.

    People living with advanced dementia or who were nonverbal were not offered any form of structured or unstructured activity in the morning of our inspection visit.from the report
  • Environment not suited to dementia

    needs fixing

    The dementia unit had no suitable books, magazines or dementia-specific items, and its garden and dining room had not been adapted well. The Allonsfield Suite was also described as dark and tired.

    There were no books, magazines, or dementia specific items such as twiddle muffs.from the report
  • Inconsistent management checks

    needs fixing

    There was no clear system to check the wellbeing of everyone throughout the day. The quality assurance systems had failed to identify all the issues found by inspectors.

    There were quality assurance system in place. However, these had not identified all of the concerns identified above.from the report
  • Dining support gaps

    needs fixing

    Some people were not supported consistently or with full dignity before lunch. In one dining room, no staff member stayed after meals were served, so immediate help was not available if someone choked.

    In the Allonsfield suite no member of staff stayed in the dining room once people had been served their meal.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What specific changes have been made in the dementia unit since the inspection, and how are you checking that people receive regular supervision and meaningful activity?
  2. 02How do you make sure staff are deployed in the dementia unit and dining rooms when people need support?
  3. 03How are you adapting the dementia unit, garden and dining room to make them easier and more supportive for people living with dementia?
  4. 04What system now checks the wellbeing of people who stay in their rooms, lounges or move around the home?
  5. 05How will you show families that the improvement plan is being completed and that improvements are being sustained?

This unannounced inspection looked at all five key questions and included infection prevention and control measures. This explanation was written from the published report of 19 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Allonsfield House

7 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. September 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Allonsfield House

  2. October 2022Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2020Goodup from Inadequate
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. August 2019Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. October 2017Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. June 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. March 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Kingsley Care Homes Limited

7 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Downham Grange

Downham Market, PE38
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated 13 months agoReport explained

Heron Lodge

Norwich, NR12
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 8 years agocare home

Kirkley Manor

Lowestoft, NR33
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home

Lynfield

Bungay, NR35
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 5 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Woodbridge

Wickham House

Woodbridge, IP13 · 2.7 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home

Cavell Manor

Woodbridge, IP12 · 8.4 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Mills Meadow

Woodbridge, IP13 · 8.6 km
Not yet rated
ResidentialDementia
Not yet ratedcare home

Mills Meadow

Woodbridge, IP13 · 8.6 km
Outstanding
ResidentialDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home