Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Achieve Together

Cherrycroft

59 Crowstone Road, Westcliff-on-Sea, SS0 8BG

Goodpublished 12 November 2024, 21 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2024

Cherrycroft rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious problems with safety, staffing, training and management.

Inspectors carried out an unannounced inspection over visits in December 2023. They spoke with people living in the home, relatives and staff. They reviewed care records, medicines records, staff files and management checks.

They found people were at risk because risk plans, fire checks and health and safety checks were not kept up to date. Staffing was not enough to meet people's needs, and staff training and supervision had major gaps. Inspectors were also not assured that possible safeguarding incidents were always recorded or reported.

Care was not always respectful or based on people's goals and preferences. People could access healthcare and were supported with food and drink, but activities, community access and involvement in care were inconsistent. Management checks had not identified or corrected important problems.

The overall rating fell from Good at the previous inspection to Inadequate. The home was placed in special measures, which means the CQC will keep it under review and expects significant improvement.

What inspectors praised
  • Food and drink support

    People were supported to eat and drink, and menus were developed with people using the home. Dietary needs and preferences were recorded.

    People were supported to eat and drink to maintain their health and nutrition.from the report
  • Healthcare access

    Staff contacted health professionals when needed and recorded their advice in support plans. Relatives said staff arranged health appointments.

    Staff contacted health professionals such as GP's and nurses if this was needed.from the report
  • Some positive activities

    Some people accessed the community, and one person was supported to attend a regular voluntary job which helped their independence and confidence.

    This has developed the person's independence and confidence.from the report
  • Immediate response after inspection

    The interim management team was open about the concerns and sent the CQC an action plan after the inspection.

    Following the inspection an action plan was sent to us which included additional management support.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • People at risk

    serious

    Important risk information was out of date. Fire risk actions, fire checks and personal emergency evacuation plans were not consistently completed or reviewed.

    People were not always protected from avoidable harm.from the report
  • Not enough skilled staff

    serious

    Staffing did not always meet people's emotional, leisure and community needs. Training compliance was very low and some supervision and agency staff records were missing.

    The provider had failed to ensure enough competent and skilled staff were deployed in the service.from the report
  • Safeguarding records

    serious

    Inspectors could not confirm that all accidents and possible abuse incidents had been recorded or reported to safeguarding authorities and the CQC.

    The systems for safeguarding people from abuse were not operated effectively.from the report
  • Dignity and privacy

    serious

    Relatives reported concerns about people wearing unsuitable clothing and footwear. Inspectors also found an example where a person was being put to bed while naked with the door open.

    People were not always treated with dignity and respect.from the report
  • Weak care planning

    needs fixing

    Care plans did not always reflect people's current needs, goals or aspirations. Reviews and key worker meetings were not happening consistently.

    There was limited information recorded in care plans related to progress on people's goals or aspirations.from the report
  • Poor management oversight

    serious

    Audits often failed to identify serious problems or ensure that known problems were fixed. Some relatives said they had lost faith in the management.

    Effective systems to monitor and improve the quality of the service, were not robust.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many staff are now on duty at different times, and how are one-to-one hours recorded and checked?
  2. 02What action has been taken to bring staff training, refresher training and supervision up to date?
  3. 03How are risk plans, fire checks, emergency evacuation plans and health and safety checks now reviewed?
  4. 04How are safeguarding incidents, accidents and medicine errors recorded, investigated and reported?
  5. 05How are people's goals, communication needs, activities and community access recorded and reviewed with them and their representatives?

The inspection began as a focused review of Safe, Effective and Well-led, but concerns led the CQC to widen it to a comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 June 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Cherrycroft

4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. June 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Cherrycroft

  2. January 2022Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  4. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  5. September 2020

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 September 2020.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Achieve Together Limited

141 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Hillside

Ilkeston, DE7
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Westcliffe Villa

Westgate-on-Sea, CT8
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained
Nearby

Other care homes near Westcliff-on-Sea

Sands Lodge

Westcliff-on-Sea, SS0 · 0.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

The Grange

Westcliff-on-Sea, SS0 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 2 months agocare home