CQC report explained · a nursing home

Aspray House

481 LeaBridge Road, Leyton, London, E10 7EB

Goodpublished 27 February 2026, 6 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The report

We have not explained this report yet

The CQC published its most recent report on Aspray House on 30 June 2022. We are still reading it. Check back soon, or read the report itself on cqc.org.uk.

Read the report on cqc.org.uk

The story over the years

Every inspection of Aspray House

9 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

June 2022Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk
February 2021Requires improvementdown from Good
Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk
May 2020Goodup from Requires improvement
Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
March 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
January 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
June 2017Requires improvementdown from Good
Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
September 2016Goodup from Requires improvement
Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
November 2015Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
April 2015Requires improvement
Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
March 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
January 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
May 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
November 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
September 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
March 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

About live-in care How PrimeCarers works

Nearby