Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by JK Healthcare

Weald Hall Residential Home

Weald Hall Lane, Thornwood, Epping, CM16 6ND

Goodpublished 18 October 2022, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Are people protected from harm? Staffing, medicines, infection control, safeguarding.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Requires improvement
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the service run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The report

We have not explained this report yet

The CQC published its most recent report on Weald Hall Residential Home on 10 March 2023. We are still reading it. Check back soon, or read the report itself on cqc.org.uk.

Read the report on cqc.org.uk
The story over the years

Every inspection of Weald Hall Residential Home

10 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Inadequate to Good.

  1. March 2023Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  2. October 2022Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2021Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2020Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2016Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. December 2015Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Effective: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. October 2015Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. May 2015Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  15. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  16. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  17. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by JK Healthcare Limited

4 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Austenwood

Gerrards Cross, SL9
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Epping

Ashlar House

Epping, CM16 · 3.0 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

Tye Green Lodge

Harlow, CM18 · 4.6 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 8 years agocare home

Abbot Care Home

Harlow, CM18 · 4.8 km
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home