Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by SheffCare

Valley Wood

1 Cat Lane, Gleadless, Sheffield, S2 3AY

Goodpublished 2 August 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm, with enough staff, safe recruitment, safe medicines systems and infection control. They identified issues with window restrictors and the storage of returned medicines, and the provider took immediate action.
Effective?
Good
People had assessments and care plans, staff received training and support, and people were helped with food, drink and healthcare. The building was clean and suitable overall, although more work was needed to help people with dementia navigate around the home.
Caring?
Good
Staff were kind and patient, understood people's needs and preferences, and gave people time to communicate. People were involved in decisions, and their privacy, dignity and independence were supported.
Responsive?
Good
Care was personalised and reflected people's choices, communication needs and goals. People could take part in activities inside and outside the home, and complaints were investigated and responded to.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found a positive culture, visible management and staff who felt supported and able to raise concerns. Audits were used to identify issues and improve care, and people, relatives and staff were asked for feedback.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2023

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some improvements made during the inspection.

This was the first inspection of the newly registered home. It was unannounced and took place on 5, 9 and 22 June 2023. Two inspectors and an Expert by Experience visited, spoke with 7 residents, 20 relatives and staff, and reviewed care and staff records.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines management, suitable care plans, kind staff and good support for people's choices, communication, activities and healthcare.

Inspectors identified a few issues during the visit. Window restrictors were not operated in line with best practice, some returned medicines needed more secure storage, and more work was needed to help people with dementia find their way around the home. The provider took immediate action on the first two points and said further work would be done on dementia support.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough staff to respond to people promptly, and recruitment checks had been completed safely.

    We observed staff interacting with people and found there were sufficient staff available to respond to people in a timely way.from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff understood people's needs and preferences, treated them kindly and patiently, and supported their privacy and independence.

    People were treated well by staff who were kind and patient with them.from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans reflected people's preferences and goals. Staff supported communication and offered choices about care, meals and activities.

    People received personalised care which met their needs and reflected their choices.from the report
  • Open management

    The management team was visible and staff felt able to raise concerns. Audits and feedback were used to identify improvements.

    People, relatives, and staff predominantly felt involved and listened to.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Window restrictors

    needs fixing

    Window restrictors were not operated with a key or special device as recommended by best practice guidance. The provider took immediate action after inspectors raised this.

    However, the window restrictors were not operated by a key or a special device in line with best practice guidance.from the report
  • Returned medicines

    needs fixing

    Some improvements were needed in how returned medicines were stored securely. The registered manager took immediate action to correct this.

    We identified some improvements were needed relating to the secure storage of returns medicine.from the report
  • Dementia-friendly navigation

    minor

    The building met people's needs overall, but more work was needed to help people with dementia find their way around. The manager said this would include more personalisation of bedroom doors.

    However more work was required to support people with dementia to navigate around the home.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to the window restrictors since the inspection?
  2. 02How are returned medicines stored now, and how is this checked?
  3. 03What changes have been made to help residents with dementia navigate around the home?
  4. 04How will you make sure each resident's communication needs and personal preferences continue to be reflected in their care plan?
  5. 05How are relatives' feedback and complaints recorded, investigated and used to improve care?

This was an unannounced first inspection covering all five CQC questions, including the care provided and the premises; there were no previous ratings to carry over. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Valley Wood

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the service was registered.

  1. August 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Valley Wood

  2. March 2022

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 11 March 2022.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by SheffCare Limited

8 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Burnt Tree Croft

Sheffield, S3
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 12 months agocare home

Cotleigh

Sheffield, S12
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 15 months agocare home

Deerlands

Sheffield, S5
Good
Residential
Rated 8 years agocare home

Grange Crescent

Sheffield, S11
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Housteads

Sheffield, S13
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

Knowle Hill

Sheffield, S20
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Sheffield

Hascott House

Sheffield, S2 · 0.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Berners Road

Sheffield, S2 · 1.4 km
Not yet rated
Residential
Not yet ratedcare home