Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Ivolve Group

Tudor Lodge

45 The Gallop, Sutton, SM2 5RY

Goodpublished 1 November 2023, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines processes, positive risk plans, suitable infection control and appropriate action when incidents occurred.
Effective?
Good
Care plans reflected people's needs, strengths and aspirations. Staff had relevant training, people were supported with food and healthcare, and consent and best-interest processes were followed.
Caring?
Good
People received kind and compassionate care. Staff respected privacy, dignity and personal choices, and supported people to communicate and develop independence.
Responsive?
Good
Support was personalised and reflected people's communication needs, interests and relationships. People took part in activities, stayed in contact with family and could raise concerns or complaints.
Well-led?
Good
The manager and staff created a person-centred and open culture. Governance systems were effective, families and professionals were consulted, and feedback was used to improve the service.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2023

Tudor Lodge was rated Good in all areas; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care with no breaches reported.

Inspectors visited on 4 and 5 October 2023. The first day was unannounced. One inspector spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and a healthcare professional, and checked care records, medicines, training and management records.

The home supported 7 people with learning disabilities or autism. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines systems, good infection control and a clean, suitable environment. People were supported to make choices, take positive risks, build independence and communicate in ways that worked for them.

People were treated with kindness and respect. Care was tailored to individual needs and interests, including activities, relationships, health support and community visits. The manager and staff team were described as open, supportive and focused on improving people's quality of life.

The overall rating was Good, with Good ratings for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The rating was unchanged from the previous inspection, published in February 2018. The report does not record any breaches or enforcement action.

What inspectors praised
  • Consistent staffing

    The home had enough staff, including for one-to-one support. Low staff turnover meant people were supported by a regular team who knew them well.

    The registered manager told us staff turnover was low which helped provide people with consistent care and support from a regular and familiar staff team.from the report
  • Choice and independence

    Staff encouraged people to make decisions, take positive risks and develop everyday skills. People were supported to do as much as they could for themselves.

    People had the opportunity to try new experiences, develop new skills, gain confidence and independence.from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors observed warm, patient and respectful interactions. Staff gave people time, space and choices without rushing them.

    People received kind, compassionate care from staff who used positive, respectful language which people understood and responded well to.from the report
  • Personalised communication

    Staff understood people's communication needs and used pictures, symbols, gestures and other methods to help people understand information and express their views.

    People had individual communication plans that detailed effective and preferred methods of communication, including the approach to use for different situations.from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People were supported to maintain family relationships and take part in activities suited to their interests, including outings, exercise and community activities.

    We saw people were encouraged to take part in activities they enjoyed, for example, walks in the local area, dance classes, trampolining, bike riding, swimming, going out for meals and outings to places of interest in the community.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you assess and record my relative's communication and sensory needs?
  2. 02How would you support my relative to build independence and take positive risks safely?
  3. 03Which staff would usually support my relative, and how do you manage one-to-one support for activities and visits?
  4. 04How would you support my relative to keep in contact with family and take part in activities they enjoy?
  5. 05How are medicines reviewed and checked, including medicines covered by STOMP principles?

This was an inspection of all five key questions and included infection prevention and control; the previous overall rating was Good, published on 28 February 2018. This explanation was written from the published report of 1 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Tudor Lodge

2 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Tudor Lodge

  2. February 2018Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2016

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 31 October 2016.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Heathcotes Care Limited

51 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Dawson House

Carshalton, SM5
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Wistaston House

Crewe, CW2
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Kirklands

Leeds, LS27
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Mapperley Lodge

Nottingham, NG3
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Balby

Doncaster, DN4
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 19 months agoReport explained

Knollbeck

Barnsley, S73
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained
Nearby

Other care homes near Sutton

Larkrise

Sutton, SM2 · 0.0 km
Outstanding
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Beech Manor

Sutton, SM2 · 0.3 km
Good
Nursing
Rated 6 years agocare home

Hylton House

Sutton, SM2 · 0.5 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

44 Albion Road

Sutton, SM2 · 0.6 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 3 months agocare home