CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Advinia Healthcare
Stonedale Lodge Care Home
200 Stonedale Crescent, Liverpool, L11 9DJ
Rated Inadequate: inspectors found the service performing badly and the CQC has taken enforcement action.
What inspectors found, June 2024
Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found unsafe care, poor oversight and dignity concerns despite kind staff.
This was an unannounced inspection. Inspectors visited on 7 and 12 December 2023, then reviewed information remotely. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and management records.
The home was rated Inadequate overall. Safe and well-led were rated Inadequate. Caring was rated Requires Improvement. Inspectors found risks were not always assessed or managed, medicines were not always handled safely, and safeguarding procedures were not always followed.
People were not always treated with dignity. Some people looked unkempt, records used disrespectful wording, and there were concerns about oral care, bedding and keeping people warm. Inspectors also found that quality checks had failed to identify important problems.
There were some positive findings. People said they felt safe and liked the staff. Staff were described as kind and caring, recruitment checks were completed, infection control arrangements were adequate, and the home was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act.
Kind staff
People said they liked the staff and felt well cared for. Inspectors also observed staff interacting kindly and found staff knew the people they supported.
“Everyone else we spoke with described the staff as 'kind' and 'caring'.” from the report
People felt safe
People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe at the home.
“People told us they felt safe at the home.” from the report
Recruitment checks
The home completed checks to assess whether staff were suitable to work with vulnerable adults.
“Staff were recruited safely after checks had been undertaken on their suitability to work with vulnerable adults.” from the report
Mental capacity practice
Inspectors found that the home was working within the Mental Capacity Act principles and that required legal authorisations were in place where needed.
“We found the service was working within the principles of the MCA and if needed, appropriate legal authorisations were in place” from the report
Risks were not managed
seriousRisk assessments and care records did not always reflect people's current needs. Inspectors found concerns involving blood pressure, choking, diets, diabetes and falls.
“Risks to people's wellbeing and clinical needs were not always being assessed, mitigated or managed.” from the report
Medicines were not always safe
seriousSome prescribed medicines were not available, and instructions or records for medicines given through feeding tubes, patches and creams were incomplete.
“Prescribed medicines were not always available to be given to people as there was no stock in the home.” from the report
Safeguarding failures
seriousSafeguarding systems existed but were not used effectively. Inspectors found missed opportunities to protect people from possible harm.
“There were systems and processes in place to help identify and report abuse. However, these were not always being used effectively” from the report
Dignity and personal care
seriousSome people looked unkempt, oral care was not always offered at suitable times, and some bedding was stained. Some care records used disrespectful wording.
“People were not always being cared for in a dignified way.” from the report
Weak management checks
seriousAudits and governance checks did not identify important problems. This was the third consecutive breach relating to governance.
“However, governance systems remained ineffective as they were not thorough enough.” from the report
Staffing pressure
needs fixingThe home identified enough staff using its dependency tools, but some staff said they had to manage with the numbers available when people's needs were high.
“However, some staff told us they had to 'make do' as there was not always enough of them to provide the required level of care.” from the report
- 01What has been done to make sure every person's risk assessment reflects their current needs, including risks involving choking, diabetes, falls and blood pressure?
- 02How do you make sure all prescribed medicines are in stock and that medicines given through feeding tubes, patches and creams are recorded correctly?
- 03What immediate changes have been made to protect people from abuse or harm, and how are safeguarding concerns now checked?
- 04How are you making sure people receive timely oral care, clean bedding, help with personal presentation and support to stay warm?
- 05How will you show families that audits now identify and fix problems with care plans, medicines, infection control and daily records?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Caring and Well-led; Effective and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 June 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Stonedale Lodge Care Home
7 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has slipped, from Requires improvement to Inadequate.
- June 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- June 2023Requires improvementup from InadequateSafe: Requires improvementCaring: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- September 2022Inadequatedown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- October 2020Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvement
- June 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementCaring: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2018Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2017
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 30 November 2017.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Advinia Care Homes Limited
9 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.