Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Devonshire Care

Rotherwood Care Home

Doncaster Road, East Dene, Rotherham, S65 2DA

Goodpublished 11 October 2023, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found effective systems for managing risks, safe staffing and recruitment, appropriate infection control and medicines given as prescribed. They also found no evidence that people were at risk from the Legionella concern that prompted part of the inspection.
Effective?
Requires improvement
This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its rating was carried over from the previous inspection when calculating the overall rating.
Caring?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its rating was carried over from the previous inspection when calculating the overall rating.
Responsive?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its rating was carried over from the previous inspection when calculating the overall rating.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found approachable managers, regular feedback from people and staff, and thorough audits linked to action plans. The management team understood its responsibilities and worked with health and social care professionals.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2023

Rotherwood Care Home rated Good; inspectors found people were safe, medicines were managed properly and the home was well-led.

Inspectors visited on 31 August 2023. They spoke with people, staff and managers, reviewed care plans, risk assessments, medicines and management records, and checked building maintenance and water safety.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, suitable risk assessments, safe medicines procedures and effective infection control. People said they felt safe.

The inspection was prompted partly by concerns about Legionella risk. Inspectors found no evidence that people were at risk from this. The overall Good rating remained unchanged from the previous inspection, which was published in December 2022.

What inspectors praised
  • Water safety

    The home had a detailed assessment and action plan for managing water safety. Inspectors found no evidence that people were at risk from the concern about Legionella.

    There was a comprehensive risk assessment and action plan in place that provided assurance about the on-going management of water safety.from the report
  • Medicines

    Medicines records were up to date and showed that medicines were given as prescribed. Staff had training and checks of their competence.

    Medicine administration records (MAR) were up to date and indicated people's medicines had been administered as prescribed.from the report
  • Staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs safely and found that recruitment checks had been completed.

    There were enough staff to meet people's needs and to make sure people were safe.from the report
  • Management and improvement

    People and staff felt able to share their views. Regular audits identified actions, and inspectors saw evidence that actions had been completed.

    We saw evidence of actions being completed.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are you continuing to carry out and review the water safety action plan?
  2. 02What were the most recent findings from your medicines audits, and have they led to any changes?
  3. 03How do you use feedback from residents and relatives to make changes to the service?
  4. 04What improvements were identified in the latest quality audits, and have all the related actions been completed?
  5. 05What were the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive at the previous inspection, since these areas were not inspected during this visit?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, partly prompted by Legionella risk; the other ratings carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Rotherwood Care Home

7 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. October 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Rotherwood Care Home

  2. December 2022Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 7 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Heltcorp Limited

1 other service on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Goole Hall

Goole, DN14
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Rotherham

Little Arches

Rotherham, S65 · 0.4 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

The Cornerstone

Rotherham, S65 · 0.6 km
Not yet rated
Residential
Not yet ratedcare home

Beech Cliffe

Rotherham, S65 · 0.9 km
Good
Residential
Rated 8 years agocare home

Conway

Rotherham, S65 · 1.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home

Orchid House

Rotherham, S65 · 1.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 8 months agocare home