Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Parkview Care Homes

Parkview Care Home

70 Old Shoreham Road, Hove, BN3 6HJ

Requires improvementpublished 13 July 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Requires improvement
Medicines, infection control, staffing, recruitment and incident monitoring had improved. However, risk assessments did not always clearly record the safety checks and equipment staff needed to use.
Effective?
Requires improvement
Staff training, induction and supervision had improved, and care plans better reflected current needs. Future plans and goals were not always fully documented, and the service was still moving between paper and electronic records.
Caring?
Good
Inspectors saw warm, respectful relationships. People were offered choices, involved in their care and supported to maintain their independence and dignity.
Responsive?
Good
Staff knew people's preferences and how to respond when they were upset or anxious. People were supported with activities, community access, relationships and complaints.
Well-led?
Requires improvement
Quality checks and action plans were stronger, and leaders were open about the improvements needed. Some actions and staff meetings were not yet fully embedded in everyday practice.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind and responsive care, but safety records, unfinished decoration and management systems still needed work.

This was an unannounced follow-up inspection on 25 April 2023. Inspectors observed care, spoke with people, relatives and staff, and reviewed care, medicine, recruitment and management records.

The home had improved since earlier inspections. Medicines were administered safely, staffing levels were sufficient for people's current needs, and staff understood safeguarding. People were treated with kindness, involved in decisions and supported to follow their interests.

Some work was still unfinished. Risk assessments did not always clearly record the safety measures staff needed to check, some decoration had not been completed, and new quality systems needed to become consistent.

The overall rating changed from Inadequate to Requires Improvement. Safe, Effective and Well-led were Requires Improvement. Caring and Responsive were Good. The home left Special Measures after this inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind, respectful care

    People and relatives spoke positively about the care. Inspectors saw staff treating people with kindness, dignity and respect.

    Staff were compassionate and treated people with kindness and respect.from the report
  • Safer medicines

    Medicines were stored and given safely. Records and audits had improved, including guidance for medicines given only when needed.

    Medicines were administered and stored safely.from the report
  • Improved staffing and training

    There were enough staff for people's current needs, and mandatory training was up to date. Recruitment checks had also improved.

    At this inspection, there were enough staff on shift to meet people's needs and the planning on future rotas was robust to ensure staffing levels were safe.from the report
  • People's choices and interests

    People were involved in care planning, food choices and daily decisions. They could take part in activities and use the garden and wider community.

    We observed people being offered choices throughout the day of the inspection and where a choice was made this was respected and acted upon.from the report
  • Progress in oversight

    The management team had introduced stronger audits, action plans and reviews of incidents, complaints and safeguarding concerns.

    At this inspection, quality assurance processes were more robust, effective, and action plans were evident to drive improvements.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Risk records not always clear

    needs fixing

    Risks were generally being managed, but written assessments did not always tell staff exactly what to check or put in place. This included checks linked to smoking in a person's room.

    Further improvements were required to the documenting of these risks.from the report
  • Unfinished decoration

    minor

    Renovation work was still ongoing, with some walls only partly painted. The home was nevertheless described as clean, tidy and homely.

    This meant that some of the décor was still not finished in parts of the building, for example, walls only half painted.from the report
  • Systems not fully embedded

    needs fixing

    New management and staff-meeting processes had improved but were not yet consistently established. The report says further time was needed to show they worked reliably.

    However, these changes need to be embedded and effective over time.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure every risk assessment clearly records the equipment and checks staff must complete?
  2. 02What is the timetable for finishing the remaining decoration and renovation work?
  3. 03How are you checking that care plans include people's future plans and goals, as well as their current needs?
  4. 04When will the home move to one consistent care-record system, rather than using both paper and electronic records?
  5. 05How will you make sure staff meetings and the new quality checks remain regular and effective?

This was an unannounced follow-up inspection covering all five key questions, including infection prevention and control under Safe; it checked progress after earlier breaches and enforcement action. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 July 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Parkview Care Home

6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. July 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Parkview Care Home

  2. October 2022Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2022Inadequatedown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Parkview Care Homes Limited

1 other service on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Nearby

Other care homes near Hove

Wilbury Gardens

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

Asher Nursing Home

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Requires improvement
Nursing
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Downlands

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Good
Nursing
Rated 7 years agocare home

Crescent House

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Acorn Hove

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agoReport explained