Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Parkview Care Homes

Asher Nursing Home

33 Wilbury Gardens, Hove, BN3 6HQ

Requires improvementpublished 5 July 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2024

Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious safety and management failures despite some kind and supportive staff interactions.

This was an unannounced inspection on 18 October 2023. Two inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff. They reviewed care plans, daily notes, medicine records, training records and safety and quality information.

The home was not safe or well-led. Fire risks from people smoking in bedrooms were not properly assessed. Care plans and risk assessments were missing, inaccurate or out of date. Incidents and possible safeguarding concerns were not always recorded, investigated or reported.

Inspectors also found poor cleanliness in some bedrooms, a lack of meaningful activities, inconsistent staffing and weak support for staff. People were not always supported in line with mental capacity and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards requirements.

The overall rating fell from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection to Inadequate. Effective, Caring and Responsive were rated Requires Improvement. The home is in special measures, so CQC will keep it under review and normally re-inspect within six months if registration is not proposed for cancellation.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind daily interactions

    Inspectors saw staff being kind and caring when helping people make everyday choices. People also spoke positively about staff support.

    We saw staff interact with people in a kind and caring manner when helping them to make choices about their day-to-day care, such as what drink they would like to have.from the report
  • Healthcare partnerships

    The home worked with mental health teams, community nurses, GPs and other professionals. Referrals were made where people needed extra healthcare support.

    Staff worked with external agencies to support people with their healthcare needs.from the report
  • Recruitment checks

    The home carried out relevant pre-employment checks, including criminal record checks. Nursing staff registration checks had also been completed.

    The provider had appropriate recruitment processes in place and relevant pre-employment checks were made.from the report
  • Privacy and independence

    Staff usually respected privacy during personal care and supported people to be independent with tasks they could do.

    Staff respected people's privacy, for example by ensuring bathroom or bedroom doors were closed when they provided personal care to people.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Fire and safety risks

    serious

    People smoked in bedrooms, but there were no proper risk assessments or plans to reduce the danger. The fire risk assessment contained inaccurate information, and emollient creams had not been assessed alongside smoking risks.

    This put people at unnecessary risk of fire.from the report
  • Safeguarding and incident reporting

    serious

    Accidents and possible abuse were not consistently recorded, investigated or reported to the relevant agencies. This meant the home could not show that people were protected from further harm.

    We could not be assured that the relevant agencies had been alerted to all concerns to enable full and thorough investigations.from the report
  • Poor records and care planning

    serious

    Care plans and risk assessments were missing, inaccurate or out of date. This made it harder for staff, especially agency staff, to understand people's needs and provide safe, personalised care.

    Information provided for staff was confusing and contradictory.from the report
  • Cleanliness and infection control

    serious

    Some bedrooms were unhygienic, with rotting food and fruit flies. Beds did not always have sheets, mattresses were not routinely cleaned and staff did not always use protective equipment correctly.

    A number of the rooms we observed were significantly unhygienic with rotting food items and fruit flies evident.from the report
  • Very limited activities

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found little meaningful activity. People said they were bored, and the home was not providing enough opportunities linked to their interests.

    There were no structured activities provided for people to motivate and engage with them to do the things they enjoyed.from the report
  • Weak management oversight

    serious

    Quality checks did not lead to reliable improvements. Staff did not receive regular supervision, meetings were inconsistent and there was no clear improvement plan.

    The governance processes in place were ineffective and risks to people and staff were not being mitigated.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate changes have been made to assess and control the risks from people smoking in their bedrooms?
  2. 02How are accidents, incidents and safeguarding concerns now recorded, investigated and reported to CQC or the local authority?
  3. 03Which care plans and risk assessments have been updated, and how do you make sure agency staff can follow them?
  4. 04What regular activities are now available, including activities linked to each person's interests and any Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards conditions?
  5. 05How often are staff now supervised and team meetings held, and how is progress checked against the improvement plan?

This unannounced inspection looked at the premises, nursing and personal care, infection control and all five key questions; the report says the inspection was prompted by concerns about safeguarding, staffing, nutrition, hydration and activities. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Asher Nursing Home

7 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Requires improvement to Inadequate.

  1. January 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Asher Nursing Home

  2. September 2021Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. May 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2016Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2015Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Effective: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. August 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. February 2015

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. January 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Parkview Care Homes Limited

1 other service on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Nearby

Other care homes near Hove

Wilbury Gardens

Hove, BN3 · 0.0 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

Parkview Care Home

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

Crescent House

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Downlands

Hove, BN3 · 0.1 km
Good
Nursing
Rated 7 years agocare home