CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Liaise
Park House
32 Ferme Park Road, Crouch End, London, N4 4ED
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, February 2024
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, effective and well-managed care, with some record-keeping gaps already corrected.
The home supports up to six adults with a learning disability or autism. Six people were living there during the inspection. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care and checked care records, medicines, recruitment files and management checks.
The inspection was focused on Safe, Effective and Well-led. All three were rated Good. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines arrangements, detailed risk assessments, suitable training and support from health professionals. People were supported to make choices, stay healthy and take part in decisions about their care.
The inspection followed an increase in reported incidents. Inspectors found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from this concern. They found some gaps in weight records, but the manager had taken action to correct them. The overall rating remains Good, and the home had acted on recommendations from the previous inspection.
Choice and independence
People had personalised rooms, access to shared areas and support to make choices. Care plans focused on building independence and reducing restrictions.
“People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible” from the report
Safe staffing and medicines
Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs and safe recruitment checks. Medicine records were complete and medicines were checked regularly.
“Medicine administration records were completed correctly with no gaps and reasons for giving 'as needed' medicines were documented.” from the report
Personalised support
Care plans covered physical and mental health, communication, cultural and spiritual needs, as well as people's goals and end of life wishes.
“Support plans included people's end of life care wishes.” from the report
Open management
Management was visible and approachable. Relatives and staff could raise concerns or suggestions, and the home used audits and meetings to make improvements.
“Management were visible in the service, approachable and took a genuine interest in what people, staff and other professionals had to say.” from the report
Learning from incidents
The home reviewed incidents, discussed lessons with staff and changed an activity arrangement to reduce distress for one person.
“The lesson learnt was the activity could have been broken down into two slots of smaller groups at different times.” from the report
Gaps in weight records
minorA quality check found missing weight recordings for three people. The manager had taken action and corrected the issue, but you may want to check how this is now monitored.
“there were gaps in records. For example, there were gaps in weight recordings for 3 people.” from the report
- 01How do you now check that everyone's weight records are completed on time?
- 02What changes were made after the increase in reported incidents, and how do you know those changes are working?
- 03How are restriction reduction plans reviewed, and how do you make sure calming medicines are used only as a last resort?
- 04How do you involve relatives in reviews of care plans, including cultural, spiritual and end of life wishes?
- 05How do you make sure people's food choices and cultural preferences continue to shape the weekly menus?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected during this visit and their previous ratings were carried forward. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Park House
4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- February 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- April 2019Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2017Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- October 2015Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- June 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- April 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- June 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 June 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Liaise (London) Limited
8 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.