CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Barchester Healthcare
Oak Grange
14 Mollington Grange, Parkgate Road, Mollington, Chester, CH1 6NP
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, November 2023
Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind staff and positive food and activities, but serious gaps in staffing, risk management, care records and oversight.
This was an unannounced inspection carried out over five visits in July and August 2023. Inspectors spoke with 14 people, 13 family members, 23 staff and three visiting health and social care professionals. They also reviewed care plans, medicine records, staff files and management records.
The home was not always safe or well managed. There were not always enough staff, people experienced long waits for call bells, and risks from falls were not consistently managed. Some safeguarding procedures were not followed, medicine records contained inaccuracies, and information for the fire service was not fully accurate.
Care plans were not always updated when people's needs changed. The home did not always follow the law about consent and deprivation of liberty. Inspectors found kind and caring staff, positive comments about food, and activities taking place, but rated all five areas Requires Improvement. The previous overall rating was Good, published in December 2021.
Kind and respectful staff
Most people and families had something positive to say about the staff. Inspectors saw staff listen to people, act on what they said and protect their privacy.
“Nursing and care staff were seen to be kind and caring in their approach.” from the report
Food and nutrition
Inspectors found that people's nutritional needs were being met. Staff knew people's dietary needs and preferences, and comments about the food were generally positive.
“The nutritional needs of people were being met. Staff were aware of people's dietary needs and preferences.” from the report
Activities
People had opportunities to take part in activities and pastimes. Inspectors saw activities happening on each day of the inspection.
“We observed people engaging in a range of activities on each day of our inspection” from the report
Infection control
Inspectors were assured that systems and practices were in place to prevent and manage infections, including COVID-19.
“Effective systems, policies, procedures, and practices were in place to ensure people were protected from infection including COVID-19.” from the report
Working with health professionals
A visiting doctor and other health professionals gave positive feedback about the home's cooperation and care.
“A visiting doctor told us that managers and staff worked collaboratively with them to ensure people's health care needs were met.” from the report
Staffing and response times
seriousThere were not always enough suitably skilled staff. People reported long waits for call bells, and rotas showed staffing below the home's stated target on several days.
“People told us that they had to wait long periods of time for staff to answer the nurse call bell” from the report
Falls and other risks
seriousFalls risks were not always assessed or managed effectively. Measures in care plans were not always followed, leaving people at risk of avoidable harm.
“Measures to reduce the risk of falls were not always effective, leaving vulnerable people at risk of injury and harm.” from the report
Safeguarding
seriousAn unexplained bruising incident was not reported to the local safeguarding authority as required. Some staff were unclear about safeguarding reporting and whistleblowing procedures.
“Records showed that a vulnerable person had suffered unexplained bruising, however, this had not been reported to the local adult safeguarding authority” from the report
Care records
needs fixingCare plans did not always contain important information or reflect changes in people's needs. Inspectors continued to find recording errors and omissions during the inspection.
“Care plans did not always accurately reflect people's needs and were not always reviewed and revised when needs changed.” from the report
Consent and restrictions
seriousThe home had not always completed mental capacity assessments or applied for deprivation of liberty safeguards in good time for people who might not be safe to leave alone.
“The provider was not always working within the principles of the MCA.” from the report
Complaints
needs fixingFour relatives reported complaints about care, including staffing. Only one said they had received a satisfactory response.
“The three relatives who raised concerns about staffing levels told us that their complaints had not been taken seriously” from the report
- 01What staffing levels are now in place on each nursing care community during the day and at night?
- 02How are falls risks, pressure alarm mats and other safety measures now checked and acted on?
- 03How do you make sure care plans are updated promptly when a person's needs, medicines or risks change?
- 04How do you complete mental capacity assessments and apply for Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards when needed?
- 05What action has been taken on complaints about staffing and how are responses now checked?
The inspection began as a focused review of Safe, Effective and Well-led, but was broadened to include all five key questions and became a comprehensive inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Oak Grange
5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- November 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2021GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- February 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- July 2019Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2019Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- May 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2014Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not ratedEffective: Inspected but not ratedCaring: Inspected but not ratedResponsive: Inspected but not ratedWell-led: Inspected but not rated
- July 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2012
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 May 2012.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited
236 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.