CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Wings Care (North West)
Oak Cottage
24 New Hall, Liverpool, L10 1LD
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, February 2024
Rated Requires Improvement; safe care was Inadequate, with unsafe medicines management, poor risk controls and weak oversight.
This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 14, 19 and 22 December 2023. Inspectors looked only at Safe and Well-led. They reviewed care and medicine records, spoke with people, a relative and staff, and checked how the home was managed.
Inspectors found serious safety problems. Medicines were not reliably recorded or stored, staff were not always shown to be competent to give injectable medicines, and people's risks and needs were not properly assessed. Checks to reduce the risk of Legionella bacteria were also not completed properly.
The home was rated Requires Improvement overall. Safe was rated Inadequate. Well-led was rated Requires Improvement in the ratings table, although the detailed findings describe widespread and significant leadership shortfalls. The previous overall rating was Good in August 2017, but inspectors said quality and safety had significantly declined.
People felt safe
People told inspectors they felt safe living at the home and with the staff team.
“People told us they felt safe living in the home and with the staff team that supported them.” from the report
Clean accommodation
The home was satisfactorily clean, and people were supported to keep their own apartments clean and tidy.
“The home's environment was satisfactorily clean and people were prompted and supported to keep their own apartments clean and tidy.” from the report
Activities and family contact
People were supported to take part in activities they enjoyed, use the community and maintain family relationships.
“People were supported to maintain positive family relationships and family members visited without restriction. This was good practice.” from the report
Medicines were not managed safely
seriousRecords did not reliably show which medicines had been given, and stock could not be checked properly. Some staff could not give required medicines at night, and there was not enough evidence that staff were competent to give injectable medicines.
“There was no robust system in place to account for medicines.” from the report
Risks were not properly controlled
seriousPeople's health, safety and emotional needs were not adequately assessed or supported. This included risks linked to domestic appliances, changes in accommodation and emotional distress.
“Risks to people's health, safety and welfare were not adequately assessed, and mitigated against to prevent avoidable harm.” from the report
Legal rights and consent
seriousMental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not always completed. Conditions attached to some Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards authorisations were not followed.
“People's legal right to consent to and make decisions about their care and treatment had not been supported in line with the MCA.” from the report
Weak management checks
seriousAudits had not found the problems with medicines, care planning or Legionella monitoring. Provider and managerial oversight was not strong enough to protect people from avoidable harm.
“The governance arrangements were not robust. Managerial and provider oversight was poor and service delivery did not always promote good outcomes for people.” from the report
Agency staff information
needs fixingAgency and bank staff were regularly used to fill rota gaps. Not all agency staff had profiles showing their suitability, training, skills and competence.
“Not all of the agency staff had staff profiles in place for the manager and provider to be assured of their suitability.” from the report
- 01What changes have been made to record, store and check medicines, including injectable medicines?
- 02How are each person's risks, emotional needs and use of domestic appliances assessed and updated?
- 03How do you make sure mental capacity assessments, best-interest decisions and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards conditions are completed and followed?
- 04What checks now identify problems with care plans, medicines, health and safety and Legionella monitoring?
- 05How do you check the suitability, training and competence of agency and bank staff, and how do you track each person's one-to-one support hours?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key questions were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward when calculating the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Oak Cottage
2 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- February 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingSafe: InadequateEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2022Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- September 2017GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- September 2016
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 September 2016.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Wings Care (North West) LLP
3 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.