Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Wings Care (North West)

Oak Cottage

24 New Hall, Liverpool, L10 1LD

Goodpublished 15 August 2025, 12 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Rated Requires Improvement; safe care was Inadequate, with unsafe medicines management, poor risk controls and weak oversight.

This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 14, 19 and 22 December 2023. Inspectors looked only at Safe and Well-led. They reviewed care and medicine records, spoke with people, a relative and staff, and checked how the home was managed.

Inspectors found serious safety problems. Medicines were not reliably recorded or stored, staff were not always shown to be competent to give injectable medicines, and people's risks and needs were not properly assessed. Checks to reduce the risk of Legionella bacteria were also not completed properly.

The home was rated Requires Improvement overall. Safe was rated Inadequate. Well-led was rated Requires Improvement in the ratings table, although the detailed findings describe widespread and significant leadership shortfalls. The previous overall rating was Good in August 2017, but inspectors said quality and safety had significantly declined.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People told inspectors they felt safe living at the home and with the staff team.

    People told us they felt safe living in the home and with the staff team that supported them.from the report
  • Clean accommodation

    The home was satisfactorily clean, and people were supported to keep their own apartments clean and tidy.

    The home's environment was satisfactorily clean and people were prompted and supported to keep their own apartments clean and tidy.from the report
  • Activities and family contact

    People were supported to take part in activities they enjoyed, use the community and maintain family relationships.

    People were supported to maintain positive family relationships and family members visited without restriction. This was good practice.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines were not managed safely

    serious

    Records did not reliably show which medicines had been given, and stock could not be checked properly. Some staff could not give required medicines at night, and there was not enough evidence that staff were competent to give injectable medicines.

    There was no robust system in place to account for medicines.from the report
  • Risks were not properly controlled

    serious

    People's health, safety and emotional needs were not adequately assessed or supported. This included risks linked to domestic appliances, changes in accommodation and emotional distress.

    Risks to people's health, safety and welfare were not adequately assessed, and mitigated against to prevent avoidable harm.from the report
  • Legal rights and consent

    serious

    Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not always completed. Conditions attached to some Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards authorisations were not followed.

    People's legal right to consent to and make decisions about their care and treatment had not been supported in line with the MCA.from the report
  • Weak management checks

    serious

    Audits had not found the problems with medicines, care planning or Legionella monitoring. Provider and managerial oversight was not strong enough to protect people from avoidable harm.

    The governance arrangements were not robust. Managerial and provider oversight was poor and service delivery did not always promote good outcomes for people.from the report
  • Agency staff information

    needs fixing

    Agency and bank staff were regularly used to fill rota gaps. Not all agency staff had profiles showing their suitability, training, skills and competence.

    Not all of the agency staff had staff profiles in place for the manager and provider to be assured of their suitability.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to record, store and check medicines, including injectable medicines?
  2. 02How are each person's risks, emotional needs and use of domestic appliances assessed and updated?
  3. 03How do you make sure mental capacity assessments, best-interest decisions and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards conditions are completed and followed?
  4. 04What checks now identify problems with care plans, medicines, health and safety and Legionella monitoring?
  5. 05How do you check the suitability, training and competence of agency and bank staff, and how do you track each person's one-to-one support hours?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key questions were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward when calculating the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Oak Cottage

2 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. February 2024Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: InadequateEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Oak Cottage

  2. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2017Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. September 2016

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 September 2016.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Wings Care (North West) LLP

3 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Laburnum Cottage

Liverpool, L10
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 3 years agoReport explained

Lilac Cottage

Liverpool, L10
Good
Residential
Rated 20 months agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Liverpool

Cherry Cottage

Liverpool, L10 · 0.0 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Lilac Cottage

Liverpool, L10 · 0.0 km
Good
Residential
Rated 20 months agocare home

Laburnum Cottage

Liverpool, L10 · 0.0 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 3 years agoReport explained

Brook View

Liverpool, L9 · 1.2 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 10 months agocare home

Jasmine House

Liverpool, L9 · 1.4 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home