Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Surrey Mental Health

North Downs Villa

19 Elmwood Road, Croydon, CR0 2SN

Goodpublished 10 October 2024, 22 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

North Downs Villa was rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious safety, leadership and independence concerns.

This was an urgent, unannounced comprehensive inspection on 29 September 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, staff and healthcare professionals. They reviewed care records, staff files, medicines records, policies and quality checks. They also inspected the building and grounds.

The home was not keeping people safe. There were safeguarding risks linked to a separate residence in the grounds, missed notifications to CQC, gaps in staff training and hazards in the building. The home was also restrictive, and people were not given enough support to build everyday living skills and independence.

The overall rating fell from Requires Improvement to Inadequate. Safe and well-led were rated Inadequate. Effective and responsive were rated Requires Improvement. Caring remained Good. The home was placed in special measures, and CQC requested action plans and said it would continue to monitor progress.

What inspectors praised
  • Suitable recruitment

    The home used applications, interviews, references, identity checks and DBS checks when recruiting staff.

    Staff were recruited through a process involving application, interview and background checks.from the report
  • Access to healthcare

    People had timely support to attend GP appointments and meet specialist mental health professionals.

    People had timely access to healthcare professionals. For example, staff supported people to attend GP appointments and recorded the outcome of these visits.from the report
  • Respectful privacy

    Inspectors saw staff knock on bedroom doors and wait for permission before entering. Care records also included personal care preferences.

    We observed staff knocking on people's bedrooms and awaiting their permission before entering.from the report
  • Support with communication and relationships

    Communication needs were assessed, and staff supported people to maintain contact with relatives when they wished.

    Staff supported people to maintain contact with people who were important to them.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Safeguarding risks

    serious

    Part of the grounds had been converted into a residence for someone who was not a resident or staff member. The home had not assessed the risks this created for people, visitors or staff.

    The provider failed to adequately protect people from the risk of abuse.from the report
  • Serious incidents not reported

    serious

    The provider did not notify CQC about significant events, including safeguarding allegations that had been substantiated by the local authority.

    The provider did not inform CQC when local authority social workers investigated and substantiated abuse allegations.from the report
  • Staff training gaps

    serious

    Staff had not received the training needed to manage behavioural support needs safely. The home also did not provide supervision at the frequency set out in its policy.

    Staff did not have the training they required to always keep people safe.from the report
  • Poor environment

    needs fixing

    The home was worn and not dementia friendly. Inspectors found damaged walls, broken tiles, waste in the garden and uncomfortable furniture, including a chair with a collapsed seat.

    The lounge area of the service was not comfortable or welcoming.from the report
  • Restrictions and limited independence

    serious

    People could not use the kitchen or laundry without staff. Staff usually completed cooking, cleaning and laundry instead of teaching people these skills.

    People could not access the kitchen or laundry room because both rooms were locked.from the report
  • Weak management oversight

    serious

    The home's audits did not identify important problems, and senior staff could not access all requested records when the registered manager left during the inspection.

    The provider's quality assurance processes were inadequate.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What safeguards and risk assessments are now in place concerning the separate residence in the grounds?
  2. 02What action has been taken to make sure all safeguarding incidents are reported to CQC without delay?
  3. 03Have all staff completed behavioural support training, and how often are staff now supervised?
  4. 04What repairs and changes have been made to the lounge, stairs, garden and dementia-friendly signage?
  5. 05How are people now being supported to use the kitchen and laundry and develop independent living skills?

This was an urgent, unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, including the building, grounds, care records, staff records, medicines and infection control. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of North Downs Villa

7 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. December 2023Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at North Downs Villa

  2. October 2020Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Inspected but not ratedEffective: GoodResponsive: Inspected but not ratedWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Effective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. August 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. December 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 December 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Croydon

Oak Field

West Croydon, CR0 · 0.6 km
Good
Residential
Rated 10 months agocare home

Warm Melody Retreat

Thornton Heath, CR7 · 0.7 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 12 months agocare home

Dunheved Lodge

Thornton Heath, CR7 · 0.8 km
Good
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home

Albany Lodge

Croydon, CR0 · 1.0 km
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated 8 months agocare home