CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Agincare
Nightingale Care and Nursing Home
234 Caxton Street, Derby, DE23 1RJ
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, March 2024
Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious problems with safety, staffing, personalised care and management.
This was an unannounced inspection on 7 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with 5 people, 12 relatives and 15 staff. They observed communal areas and checked care records, medicines records and records about how the home was managed.
Inspectors found people were at risk because health risks were not always assessed properly, medicines records were unreliable and there were not always enough staff to supervise communal areas or respond promptly. Staff training was incomplete, healthcare referrals were sometimes delayed, and people's dignity, communication needs, activities and end-of-life wishes were not always properly supported.
There were some positive findings. The home was clean, infection control was good, people enjoyed the food and staff understood how to report abuse. However, the overall rating was Inadequate. Safe, Responsive and Well-led were also rated Inadequate, while Effective and Caring were rated Requires Improvement.
Food and drink
People generally had access to drinks and snacks, enjoyed the food and had choices. Meals were prepared to meet dietary needs.
“People told us they enjoyed the food provided and had choice in the menu.” from the report
Safeguarding awareness
Staff understood their responsibility to report abuse and had up-to-date safeguarding training.
“Staff had received up to date safeguarding training and were able to demonstrate an understanding of types of abuse and how they would report these.” from the report
Some positive relationships
Some people and relatives spoke positively about staff and described good relationships with particular members of the team.
“People and relatives spoke positively about specific staff. People had good relationships with some staff members.” from the report
Medicines and health risks
seriousMedicines records did not clearly show whether people had received the correct doses. One person went without a prescribed inhaler for 11 days, and guidance for as-required medicines was not detailed enough.
“Medicine administration records (MAR) were not legible, accurate or able to clearly show people had had their prescribed medicines.” from the report
Not enough staff
seriousRelatives and staff said more staff were needed. Inspectors saw communal areas left unsupervised even though some people's care plans said they needed supervision.
“Communal areas were not always supervised. Some people's care plans said they needed supervision for their safety when in the lounge or dining space.” from the report
Incomplete staff training
seriousNot all staff had completed mandatory training, and most staff had not completed tissue viability training despite supporting people with skin care needs.
“Specialist training to meet specific healthcare needs was not always completed by staff.” from the report
Dignity and independence
seriousInspectors saw people left in uncomfortable positions and found that mobility aids were not always nearby. Some interactions were also not kind or caring.
“People's privacy, dignity and independence were not always respected and promoted.” from the report
Personalised and end-of-life care
seriousCare plans did not always reflect people's needs and wishes. End-of-life plans lacked important personal and religious details, and not all staff had end-of-life training.
“Care plans for people who were reaching the end of their lives had minimal person-centred details on how they wished to be cared for, including any religious considerations.” from the report
Weak management oversight
seriousAudits failed to identify or resolve important problems, including gaps in risk assessments, medicines guidance and end-of-life plans. Records were not always complete or accurate.
“The providers quality assurance systems were ineffective and did not always demonstrate accountability for people's care.” from the report
- 01How are you now checking medicines records and making sure as-required medicines are given and reviewed safely?
- 02How many staff are on duty on each floor, and how do you ensure communal areas are supervised and call bells are answered promptly?
- 03Which mandatory and specialist training has each staff member completed, including tissue viability and end-of-life care?
- 04How will you make sure care plans include people's communication aids, mobility equipment, personal preferences and end-of-life wishes?
- 05What actions have been completed since the inspection, and how can we see evidence that audits now identify and fix problems?
This was an unannounced first inspection of the newly registered service covering all five key questions, prompted partly by concerns about safeguarding, accidents, incidents and medicines. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 March 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Nightingale Care and Nursing Home
2 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.
- March 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from GoodSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
Read what inspectors found at Nightingale Care and Nursing Home →
- June 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- January 2020
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 January 2020.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Agincare Homes (North) Limited
2 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.