Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Mountdale

Mountdale Nursing Home

59 Mountdale Gardens, Leigh-on-Sea, SS9 4AP

Goodpublished 17 February 2025, 18 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2024

Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious problems with safety, safeguarding, staffing and management.

This was an unannounced inspection on 8, 10 and 14 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with 9 people, 7 relatives, managers and staff. They reviewed care records, medicines records, staff files and management information.

Inspectors found people were at risk of avoidable harm. Staff used unsafe moving and handling methods, some risks were not properly assessed, safeguarding concerns were not acted on, recruitment checks were incomplete and infection control was not consistently good. Staffing and activities were also not always enough to meet people's needs.

The home was rated Inadequate for Safe and Well-led, and Requires Improvement for Effective. Inspectors found weak leadership, poor oversight, missed learning from incidents and concerns, and failures to act on complaints and feedback. The home was previously rated Good in November 2017.

The overall Inadequate rating means the home is in special measures. The CQC will monitor progress and usually re-inspect within 6 months if it does not propose cancelling the provider's registration.

What inspectors praised
  • Medicines

    The medicines records reviewed were in good order. Staff gave medicines at suitable times and treated people with dignity and respect.

    These showed each person received their medicines at the times they needed them, and records were kept in good order.from the report
  • Food

    People and relatives spoke positively about the meals. Inspectors found people were supported to eat and drink enough, although hydration monitoring still needed improvement.

    People were supported to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced diet.from the report
  • Healthcare support

    The home worked with healthcare services when people needed support. Relatives said they were kept updated about care needs and health appointments.

    People were supported to access healthcare services and support as needed.from the report
  • Visitors

    People were able to receive visitors without restrictions during the inspection.

    People were able to receive visitors without restrictions in line with best practice guidance.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Safeguarding failures

    serious

    Managers did not reliably investigate allegations of abuse or report concerns to the local authority and the CQC. Staff said concerns about unexplained bruising had not led to action.

    The provider's safeguarding practices and procedures were not effective, and people were not safeguarded from abuse and avoidable harm.from the report
  • Unsafe care and risk management

    serious

    Inspectors saw four incidents of unsafe moving and handling. Some risks linked to catheters, diabetes and distressing behaviour were not properly assessed or recorded.

    Risks to people were not safely monitored and managed to support them to stay safe.from the report
  • Staffing and recruitment

    serious

    The home did not complete all required checks before employing staff. Inspectors also found periods when no staff were in the communal lounge and too few staff to provide regular activities.

    The provider did not ensure all required recruitment checks were completed on staff.from the report
  • Training and supervision

    needs fixing

    Some staff practice was unsafe despite training. Induction, supervision and appraisals were not completed as required, and some important training was missing or out of date.

    The service did not always make sure staff had the skills, knowledge, and experience to deliver effective care and support.from the report
  • Poor management oversight

    serious

    The home lacked reliable systems to identify problems, respond to complaints, learn from incidents and improve care. Required statutory notifications were also not always sent to the CQC.

    The lack of effective oversight and governance of the service has resulted in several breaches of regulatory requirements.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate changes have you made to prevent unsafe moving and handling, and how are staff observations now checked?
  2. 02Have all safeguarding concerns, including unexplained injuries, been reported and investigated properly?
  3. 03Have all staff completed the required DBS, Adult First, reference and identity checks before working with residents?
  4. 04How are staffing levels being matched to people's needs, including cover for the communal lounge and social activities?
  5. 05What is in the action plan following the Warning Notices, and how will you show families that the changes are working?

This began as a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, was widened to include Effective, and the other key-question ratings were carried over from the last inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Mountdale Nursing Home

3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. January 2024Inadequatecurrent rating
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Mountdale Nursing Home

  2. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. December 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. May 2013

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 8 May 2013.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Leigh-on-Sea

Avondale Rest Home

Leigh-on-Sea, SS9 · 0.2 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Cavell Lodge

Leigh-on-Sea, SS9 · 0.9 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

SummerHill

Leigh-on-Sea, SS9 · 1.0 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 23 months agocare home