Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Pearl Jackson

Morton Close

Morton Lane, East Morton, Keighley, BD20 6RP

Requires improvementpublished 24 March 2025, 17 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; medicines remained unsafe and leadership was unsettled, although caring improved and special measures ended.

This was an unannounced focused inspection. Inspectors visited on 18 July 2023 and reviewed care records, medicines records, staffing, training and management records. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, and observed care.

The home had made significant improvements since its previous Inadequate rating. People were treated with kindness and respect, staffing was generally enough, infection control had improved, and risks were assessed more clearly.

Important problems remained. Some medicines were given incorrectly or at the wrong time, and waste medicines were not stored safely. There was no registered manager, and systems for identifying problems, reporting incidents and driving improvement were not always strong.

The overall rating rose from Inadequate to Requires Improvement. The home remained in breach of Regulation 12, but it was no longer rated Inadequate or in special measures.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff treated people with compassion and respect. They responded warmly when people were confused or upset.

    We observed caring interactions between staff and people. Staff treated people with compassion and respect and engaged them in fun and meaningful conversations.from the report
  • Improved risk records

    Care records were clearer and risk assessments were updated when people's needs changed. Weight monitoring had also improved.

    However, the care records we reviewed were organised, clear and had some personalised information.from the report
  • Improved infection control

    Inspectors were assured that the home had suitable measures for preventing and managing infections, including the safe use of protective equipment.

    We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.from the report
  • Staff training and recruitment

    Staff had training in key safety areas, and inspectors saw moving and handling equipment being used appropriately. Recruitment checks were robust.

    Robust recruitment processes were in place. The provider completed pre-employment checks to ensure staff's suitability for the role and safety in working with vulnerable people.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines were not always safe

    serious

    Some people received medicines or creams incorrectly, including one person who did not receive the correct dose. Some time-sensitive medicines were not given as directed, and waste medicines were not stored securely.

    Some people did not have their medicines and creams administered safely because staff failed to follow the prescribers' or the manufacturers' directions properly.from the report
  • Safeguarding and learning needed improvement

    needs fixing

    Staff did not always recognise when safeguarding referrals were needed, and professionals said the home was not always proactive in learning from problems.

    We recommend the provider operates consistently robust safeguarding processes and a proactive approach to learning lessons.from the report
  • Staffing cover was not always reliable

    needs fixing

    The home's assessed safe staffing level was not always met when staff were sick because usual bank staff could not be found.

    There were some occasions where the provider's assessed safe staffing levels had not been achieved.from the report
  • Feedback was not consistently acted on

    minor

    Residents' meetings had not been held since January 2023. People said food and some activities still needed improvement, and earlier feedback had not all been addressed.

    Some areas of feedback from the last meeting had not been fully addressed.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Who is currently responsible for the home while there is no registered manager, and how often are they present?
  2. 02What has changed to make sure every medicine is given at the correct dose and time?
  3. 03How are waste medicines now stored and checked?
  4. 04What contingency arrangements are in place when staff are off sick?
  5. 05How will residents' feedback about food and activities be recorded, acted on and reviewed?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Caring and Well-led, with infection control also checked; Effective and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings carried over into the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Morton Close

5 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.

  1. September 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Morton Close

  2. January 2023Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateCaring: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. April 2019Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementCaring: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. April 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. April 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 April 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by ADL Plc

10 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Crompton Court

Liverpool, L5
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Allambie Court

Nuneaton, CV11
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated 5 months agocare home

Castle Park

Derby, DE1
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Cherry Tree House

Scunthorpe, DN16
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Jubilee House

Torquay, TQ1
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 6 months agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Keighley

Greenhill

Keighley, BD20 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 8 years agocare home

Ghyllside

Keighley, BD20 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home