Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Lifeways Community Care

Millwater

164-168 Waterloo Road, Yardley, Birmingham, B25 8LD

Requires improvementpublished 20 September 2023, 2 years ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Requires improvement
Some medicines were not managed safely. Risks linked to flammable creams, medicine patches and some as-required medicines had not always been properly assessed or recorded.
Effective?
Good
People's needs and choices were assessed, staff were trained, and people received suitable support with food, drink and healthcare.
Caring?
Good
People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff knew people well and supported their independence and involvement in decisions.
Responsive?
Good
Care was personalised and records contained information about people's preferences, communication and relationships. People were supported with activities, religion and cultural traditions.
Well-led?
Requires improvement
Management systems had improved, but medication audits had not identified the concerns found by inspectors. The home remained inconsistent in assuring high-quality care.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind, personalised care, but medicines safety and some management checks still needed improvement.

Inspectors visited on 2 August 2023 without announcing the visit and returned on 7 August. They spoke with people living at the home, relatives and staff. They observed care and checked care records, medicines records, recruitment files and management checks.

People were generally treated kindly and supported to make choices. Staff knew people well, care was personalised and people had access to health professionals, activities and important relationships. The ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were Good.

Medicines were not always managed safely. Checks had not found all the problems inspectors identified. The home remained in breach of Regulation 12 and received an overall Requires Improvement rating. This was the second time it had received this rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind relationships

    People and relatives spoke positively about staff. Inspectors saw caring relationships and staff who knew people's needs well.

    People and staff had developed positive meaningful relationships. Staff knew people well and demonstrated a kind and caring approach.from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's likes, dislikes, important relationships and communication needs. People were involved in decisions about their care.

    Staff knew people well and care records contained detailed information which helped them to provide responsive care.from the report
  • Choice and independence

    People were supported to make daily choices, maintain privacy and remain as independent as possible. Mental capacity requirements were followed.

    People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives.from the report
  • Staffing and safeguarding

    People and relatives said there were enough staff. Recruitment checks were completed safely and staff understood how to report safeguarding concerns.

    We saw staff were attentive and responded promptly to people's requests for assistance.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines were not always safe

    serious

    Some medicine patches were applied to the wrong area, patch locations were not recorded and instructions for some creams and as-required medicines were incomplete. Inspectors said this placed people at risk of harm.

    Systems and processes were not sufficient to demonstrate people's medicines were managed and administered safely. This placed people at risk of harm.from the report
  • Management checks missed problems

    needs fixing

    The home had strengthened its checks, but medication audits had not identified the medicine concerns found during the inspection. This meant opportunities to improve had been missed.

    Medication audits had not identified the concerns we found.from the report
  • Some areas needed refurbishment

    minor

    Parts of the building were tired and some surfaces were difficult to clean. Refurbishment work was scheduled to start in September 2023.

    We saw some areas of the building were difficult to clean. For example, some paintwork and the plaster on walls was chipped.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to check that medicine patches are applied to the correct place and rotated safely?
  2. 02How are staff told where prescribed creams must be applied, and how is this checked?
  3. 03What written protocols are now in place for medicines prescribed to be given as required?
  4. 04How are medication audits now tested to make sure they identify problems before someone is put at risk?
  5. 05What refurbishment work was completed after the planned start in September 2023?

This was a follow-up care home inspection covering all five key questions, including infection prevention and control, with the inspection visits taking place on 2 and 7 August 2023. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Millwater

3 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. September 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Millwater

  2. July 2019Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2017Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2016

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 8 December 2016.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Lifeways Community Care Limited

17 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Greenlands View

Birmingham, B32
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

1 & 2 Flax Cottages

Choppington, NE62
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 11 months agocare home

Ash House

Coventry, CV4
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 14 months agocare home

Barleycombe

Sudbury, CO10
Good
Residential
Rated 8 months agocare home

Beeton Grange

Birmingham, B18
Good
Residential
Rated 7 months agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Birmingham

Olivet

Birmingham, B27 · 1.3 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home