CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Lifeways Community Care
Millwater
164-168 Waterloo Road, Yardley, Birmingham, B25 8LD
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
- Safe?
- Requires improvement
- Some medicines were not managed safely. Risks linked to flammable creams, medicine patches and some as-required medicines had not always been properly assessed or recorded.
- Effective?
- Good
- People's needs and choices were assessed, staff were trained, and people received suitable support with food, drink and healthcare.
- Caring?
- Good
- People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff knew people well and supported their independence and involvement in decisions.
- Responsive?
- Good
- Care was personalised and records contained information about people's preferences, communication and relationships. People were supported with activities, religion and cultural traditions.
- Well-led?
- Requires improvement
- Management systems had improved, but medication audits had not identified the concerns found by inspectors. The home remained inconsistent in assuring high-quality care.
What inspectors found, September 2023
Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind, personalised care, but medicines safety and some management checks still needed improvement.
Inspectors visited on 2 August 2023 without announcing the visit and returned on 7 August. They spoke with people living at the home, relatives and staff. They observed care and checked care records, medicines records, recruitment files and management checks.
People were generally treated kindly and supported to make choices. Staff knew people well, care was personalised and people had access to health professionals, activities and important relationships. The ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were Good.
Medicines were not always managed safely. Checks had not found all the problems inspectors identified. The home remained in breach of Regulation 12 and received an overall Requires Improvement rating. This was the second time it had received this rating.
Kind relationships
People and relatives spoke positively about staff. Inspectors saw caring relationships and staff who knew people's needs well.
“People and staff had developed positive meaningful relationships. Staff knew people well and demonstrated a kind and caring approach.” from the report
Personalised support
Care plans included people's likes, dislikes, important relationships and communication needs. People were involved in decisions about their care.
“Staff knew people well and care records contained detailed information which helped them to provide responsive care.” from the report
Choice and independence
People were supported to make daily choices, maintain privacy and remain as independent as possible. Mental capacity requirements were followed.
“People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives.” from the report
Staffing and safeguarding
People and relatives said there were enough staff. Recruitment checks were completed safely and staff understood how to report safeguarding concerns.
“We saw staff were attentive and responded promptly to people's requests for assistance.” from the report
Medicines were not always safe
seriousSome medicine patches were applied to the wrong area, patch locations were not recorded and instructions for some creams and as-required medicines were incomplete. Inspectors said this placed people at risk of harm.
“Systems and processes were not sufficient to demonstrate people's medicines were managed and administered safely. This placed people at risk of harm.” from the report
Management checks missed problems
needs fixingThe home had strengthened its checks, but medication audits had not identified the medicine concerns found during the inspection. This meant opportunities to improve had been missed.
“Medication audits had not identified the concerns we found.” from the report
Some areas needed refurbishment
minorParts of the building were tired and some surfaces were difficult to clean. Refurbishment work was scheduled to start in September 2023.
“We saw some areas of the building were difficult to clean. For example, some paintwork and the plaster on walls was chipped.” from the report
- 01What changes have been made to check that medicine patches are applied to the correct place and rotated safely?
- 02How are staff told where prescribed creams must be applied, and how is this checked?
- 03What written protocols are now in place for medicines prescribed to be given as required?
- 04How are medication audits now tested to make sure they identify problems before someone is put at risk?
- 05What refurbishment work was completed after the planned start in September 2023?
This was a follow-up care home inspection covering all five key questions, including infection prevention and control, with the inspection visits taking place on 2 and 7 August 2023. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Millwater
3 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- September 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2019Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2017GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2016
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 8 December 2016.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Lifeways Community Care Limited
17 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.