Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Tynefield

Layden Court Care Home

All Hallows Drive, Maltby, Rotherham, S66 8NL

Goodpublished 31 January 2025, 18 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2024

Rated Inadequate and remains in special measures; inspectors found serious safety, staffing and management failures.

This was an unannounced focused inspection carried out over 21 and 24 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with 7 people, 11 relatives and 14 staff. They reviewed care, medicine and other records, including 9 people's care records.

The home was not keeping people safe. Risk assessments and care plans were unclear or inaccurate. Medicines were not always recorded or stored safely. Safeguarding concerns, accidents and incidents were not always reported or investigated properly. There were also not enough staff at some times to meet people's needs safely.

The home was rated Inadequate overall. Safe and well-led were rated Inadequate, while effective was rated Requires Improvement. The report says the home had deteriorated since its previous Good rating in March 2023.

The home remains in special measures. The provider must make improvements, and the CQC will monitor progress and normally re-inspect within 6 months if registration is not cancelled.

What inspectors praised
  • Access to healthcare

    People could access healthcare when needed. Staff monitored people's health and contacted healthcare professionals for advice.

    People told us they were able to access health care at the service and this was confirmed with relatives.from the report
  • Food choices

    People and relatives gave positive feedback about the food. Meal preference sheets recorded people's likes, dislikes and special dietary needs.

    Overall, we received positive feedback about the meals provided and people told us their individual needs and preferences were met.from the report
  • Approachable management

    Staff said they felt supported and able to raise concerns. Inspectors said managers responded openly to concerns found during the inspection.

    Staff told us they felt supported, and management were approachable.from the report
  • Recruitment checks

    The provider's recruitment policy included pre-employment checks to help make safer recruitment decisions.

    The provider's recruitment policy helped them recruit suitable staff.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unsafe risk management

    serious

    Care plans and risk assessments were not always accurate or detailed enough. Problems included unclear choking guidance, incomplete wound checks, faulty or switched-off falls sensors and call bells out of reach.

    Risk assessments and care plans were not always accurate or sufficiently detailed to enable staff to support people safely.from the report
  • Medicine safety

    serious

    Staff competency checks were missing, and records did not always show that creams and pain-relief patches had been applied correctly. Some liquid medicines were not dated when opened.

    Medicines were not managed safely. This placed people at risk of harm.from the report
  • Safeguarding and incident reporting

    serious

    Some safeguarding concerns were not referred to the local authority or shared with the CQC. Accident, incident and behaviour records were incomplete.

    The provider had not ensured people were protected from the risk of abuse.from the report
  • Not enough staff

    serious

    Staff were too busy to spend meaningful time with people or supervise those at risk of falls. Some people did not receive timely support with meals.

    We concluded there were not enough staff on duty to meet people's needs.from the report
  • Training and care guidance

    needs fixing

    Training in dementia care and supporting behaviour that may challenge was not yet effective enough. Some people did not have clear guidance to help staff provide suitable care.

    People living with dementia and people with behaviours that challenge did not have clear plans or guidance in place to guide staff about how best to support them.from the report
  • Weak management checks

    serious

    Quality systems had not identified or corrected important problems. Some food charts were incomplete and records were not always accurate or up to date.

    The provider's quality assurance systems and processes were not effective and had not enabled them to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate changes have you made to risk assessments, care plans, falls sensors and call bells since the inspection?
  2. 02How do you now check that medicines, creams and pain-relief patches are administered, stored and recorded safely?
  3. 03How many staff are on duty during busy periods, at night and at weekends, and how do you adjust this for people's needs?
  4. 04How are safeguarding concerns, accidents and incidents now reported, investigated and shared with the relevant authorities?
  5. 05What dementia and behaviour support training have staff completed, and how do you check that they are competent?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected, and the previous ratings were used to calculate the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 March 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Layden Court Care Home

9 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has held its Inadequate rating throughout.

  1. March 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Layden Court Care Home

  2. March 2023Goodup from Inadequate
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2022Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Well-led: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2022Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2020Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  7. June 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  8. April 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  9. July 2015Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  10. February 2015Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
  11. December 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 2 December 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Rotherham

Pennington Court

Rotherham, S66 · 0.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 13 months agocare home

Levitt Mill

Rotherham, S66 · 1.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 20 months agocare home

The Mews

Rotherham, S66 · 3.5 km
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agocare home

Stonecroft

Rotherham, S66 · 3.7 km
Not yet rated
Residential
Not yet ratedcare home