Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Hilton Rose Retirement Home

Hilton Rose Retirement Home Ltd

30 Broadway North, Walsall, WS1 2AJ

Goodpublished 30 January 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Staff understood safeguarding and people's risks. Medicines were usually administered safely, infection control procedures were followed, and incidents were reviewed.
Effective?
Good
This area was not inspected during this focused inspection. Its previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
Caring?
Good
This area was not inspected during this focused inspection. Its previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
Responsive?
Good
This area was not inspected during this focused inspection. Its previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found effective quality checks, a person-centred culture and good involvement of people, relatives and staff.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2024

Rated Good; inspectors found people were safe and well supported, although some medicines were unavailable on the inspection day.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 13 December 2023. One inspector and an Expert by Experience spoke with a person living in the home, relatives and staff. They reviewed care plans, medicine records, staff files and quality checks.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that staff understood risks, medicines were usually given safely, infection control procedures were followed and there were systems to learn from incidents. They also found person-centred care, activities and regular involvement of people and relatives.

Some medicines were unavailable for two people on the inspection day because of a prescribing and dispensing error. The provider acted quickly, sought medical advice and no one came to harm. The inspection did not assess Effective, Caring or Responsive, so those ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Managing risks

    Risks were assessed and care plans gave staff clear guidance about how to reduce them. Staff understood people's individual risks.

    Risks were assessed, and plans were put in place to mitigate the risks.from the report
  • Safe medicines practice

    Staff had medicine training and were observed giving medicines as prescribed. Records and storage checks were accurate.

    Medicines were administered in line with the providers policy.from the report
  • Person-centred care

    Care plans recorded people's preferences and wishes. Staff knew these plans and supported people with activities and time outside the home.

    Care plans were person centred and gave staff details about people's preferences and wishes relating to their care needs.from the report
  • Quality monitoring

    The provider used regular audits and acted on issues identified through external checks, including fire safety and infection control.

    The provider had quality assurance systems in place.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine availability

    needs fixing

    Some medicines were unavailable for two people on the inspection day because of an error in prescribing and dispensing. The provider took action and no one came to harm.

    Some medicines were not available to 2 people on the day of the inspection.from the report
  • Waiting for help

    minor

    One person said staff were busy and they sometimes had to wait for support. Inspectors observed that people's needs were met promptly and said this did not affect their care.

    Staff are always busy, I sometimes have to wait for help.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to prevent medicines being unavailable because of prescribing or dispensing errors?
  2. 02How do you make sure people receive prompt help when staff are busy?
  3. 03How are people's risks and care plans reviewed after a fall or other incident?
  4. 04How do residents and relatives influence activities and changes in the home?
  5. 05What were the previous ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive, which were not inspected this time?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection on 19 March 2018. This explanation was written from the published report of 30 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Hilton Rose Retirement Home Ltd

5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Inadequate to Good.

  1. January 2024Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Hilton Rose Retirement Home Ltd

  2. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. March 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2016Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2015Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. August 2015Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. October 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. August 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 August 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Walsall

Lincoln Road

Walsall, WS1 · 0.4 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Lonsdale House

Walsall, WS4 · 0.7 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Hawabu House

Walsall, WS1 · 1.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 4 months agocare home

Highgate Road

Walsall, WS1 · 1.4 km
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Rushall Care Home

Walsall, WS4 · 1.5 km
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated last monthcare home

Gorway House

Walsall, WS1 · 1.6 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home