Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Harmony Care Homes (2003)

Highgate Road

91 Highgate Road, Walsall, WS1 3JA

Goodpublished 28 February 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm, and risks, medicines and infection control were generally managed safely. However, one alleged abuse incident was not reported as required, self-employed staff checks were incomplete, and two specialist chairs posed an infection risk.
Effective?
Good
This focused inspection did not assess Effective.
Caring?
Good
This focused inspection did not assess Caring.
Responsive?
Good
This focused inspection did not assess Responsive.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found a positive and open culture, clear management support and systems for monitoring quality. Some day-to-day checks were not formally recorded, but a recording system was introduced after the inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Highgate Road rated Good; inspectors found people were safe and well supported, but noted gaps in checks on some workers and equipment.

This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 1 February 2024. Inspectors looked at Safe and Well-led. They spoke with one person, three relatives and three staff members, and reviewed care records, medicines records, quality checks and two recruitment files.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. People and relatives said they felt safe. Inspectors found that risks, medicines, staffing, safeguarding and infection control were generally managed well. People were supported to make choices and take part in activities they enjoyed.

There were some shortfalls. One alleged abuse incident had not been reported as required. Checks on self-employed staff were not always completed, and two specialist chairs were in poor condition and posed an infection risk. Some day-to-day checks were not formally recorded, although action was taken after the inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Medicines and infection control

    Inspectors found that medicines were managed safely and that staff followed infection prevention procedures, including using protective equipment safely.

    We saw that medicines were managed safely. This included the; ordering, storage, administration, recording and disposal of medicines.from the report
  • Positive culture

    People, relatives and staff described a positive service. The provider had systems for learning from problems and improving care.

    The provider had created a learning culture at the service which improved the care people received.from the report
  • Staffing levels

    Inspectors found enough suitably skilled staff, with staffing adjusted when people's needs required it. Directly employed staff had been recruited with the required checks.

    People and their relatives told us and we saw there were enough suitably skilled staff to support people in line with their agreed needs.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Safeguarding report missed

    serious

    One alleged abuse incident had not been reported to the local authority or CQC as required. The manager had kept the person safe and showed inspectors that learning had taken place.

    However, we found 1 incident of alleged abuse that had not been reported to the local authority or us as required.from the report
  • Checks on self-employed staff

    needs fixing

    The provider did not always complete checks to make sure self-employed workers were safe to work with people. CQC recommended an effective checking system.

    Where staff were not directly employed by the provider (self employed staff) checks were not always made to ensure these staff were safe to work with people.from the report
  • Specialist chairs

    needs fixing

    Two specialist chairs were in poor condition and posed an infection risk. The manager was taking action when inspectors raised this.

    Two of the specialist chairs used at the service were in a poor condition posing an infection risk.from the report
  • Records of daily checks

    minor

    Some day-to-day checks were completed but not formally recorded. The manager introduced a new system after the inspection to record checks and actions taken.

    However, some day-to-day checks completed by the manager were not formally recorded to show they had been completed.from the report
  • Community activities

    minor

    People took part in activities at home and in the community. However, some staff and one relative felt people could access the community more often.

    Although some staff and a relative felt people could access the community on a more frequent basis.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What checks are now completed before self-employed staff work at the home, and how are those checks recorded?
  2. 02What action was taken to replace or repair the two specialist chairs that posed an infection risk?
  3. 03How do you make sure every safeguarding incident is reported to the local authority and CQC when required?
  4. 04What do staff handovers cover, and how do you make sure they include enough detail about people's changing needs?
  5. 05Has the new manager's application to register been completed, and who is legally overseeing the home until then?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; Effective, Caring and Responsive were not assessed during this visit. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Highgate Road

4 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Highgate Road

  2. November 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2017Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. May 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 May 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Walsall

Hawabu House

Walsall, WS1 · 0.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 4 months agocare home

Gorway House

Walsall, WS1 · 0.4 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

South Street

Walsall, WS1 · 0.7 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 6 months agocare home

Lincoln Road

Walsall, WS1 · 1.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home