CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Ferncross Care
Ferncross Residential Home
4 Crossdale Avenue, Heysham, Morecambe, LA3 1PE
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, January 2024
Ferncross Residential Home was rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found unsafe medicines, recruitment and safety oversight.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 14 and 18 December 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and a health and social care professional. They checked care records, medicines records, staff files, rotas, risk assessments and the home.
The home was not safe. Medicines records were poor, and an unauthorised and untrained staff member was administering medicines. Recruitment checks were incomplete. Risk assessments and care plans were not always current. Inspectors also found problems with gas safety, Legionella checks and hot water temperatures.
The home was not well-led. Checks and audits had failed to find important problems. The overall rating changed from Good at the previous inspection to Inadequate. The home is in special measures, and the CQC will monitor progress and normally re-inspect within six months.
Staff availability
Inspectors found enough staff were employed, and people and relatives said staff were available to support them.
“There were enough staff employed. Our observations during the inspection and staffing rotas supported this.” from the report
Safeguarding knowledge
Staff knew how to recognise and report abuse. People and relatives said they felt safe with staff and management.
“Staff were trained to identify and report suspected abuse. Staff members were competent in this area.” from the report
Infection control
Inspectors were assured that infection prevention and control processes were appropriate, including the use of protective equipment.
“We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
Caring relationships
Inspectors saw positive interactions, and people and relatives said staff provided person-centred care.
“During the inspection visit, we saw positive and caring interactions between management, staff and people who lived at the home.” from the report
Unsafe medicines
seriousRecords for controlled drugs could not be relied on. An unauthorised and untrained staff member was administering medicines.
“A staff member was administering medicines who was not authorised or trained.” from the report
Recruitment checks
seriousSome essential checks on staff had not been completed, including checks about criminal records, identity, right to work and previous employers.
“Safe recruitment procedures were not followed. In 2 cases no checks had been made into staff member's backgrounds.” from the report
Risk and environmental safety
seriousRisk assessments were missing or out of date. Inspectors also found an expired gas safety certificate, no Legionella checks and hot water that could cause scalding.
“Some environmental safety issues needed addressing - the gas safety certificate was 2 years out of date and there were no Legionella bacteria checks taking place.” from the report
Weak oversight
seriousManagement checks did not identify or deal with the problems found. Some accidents and incidents were not properly recorded or reviewed.
“Although we noted a general lack of checks and audits in the service, any checks taking place, had not been effective in establishing the breaches of regulations seen in the 'safe' section of this report.” from the report
- 01Which staff are currently authorised and trained to administer medicines, and how are controlled-drug stocks and records checked?
- 02Have all recruitment files been reviewed, including criminal record, identity, right-to-work and previous-employer checks?
- 03What current risk assessments are in place for bedrails, falls and accidents, and how are they reviewed after incidents?
- 04Has the home completed gas safety, Legionella and hot-water checks, and what work remains from the fire safety programme?
- 05What independent checks are now in place to make sure problems are found and fixed promptly?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried over from the last inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Ferncross Residential Home
4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.
- January 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from GoodSafe: InadequateEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate
- May 2022Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- February 2021
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 February 2021.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Ferncross Care LTD
1 other service on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.