CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Freeways
Clevedon House
70-72 Clevedon Road, Weston-super-Mare, BS23 1DF
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- People felt safe and staff knew how to report concerns. Risk assessments, staffing, recruitment, medicines and infection controls were generally found to support people's safety, although some medicine records did not match and some bathroom equipment needed replacement.
- Effective?
- Good
- This area was not inspected in this report. Its previous rating was carried forward when calculating the overall rating.
- Caring?
- Good
- This area was not inspected in this report. Its previous rating was carried forward when calculating the overall rating.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This area was not inspected in this report. Its previous rating was carried forward when calculating the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Good
- The home had an approachable manager, regular quality checks and a positive culture. People and staff were able to share views, and records showed that improvements were acted on promptly.
What inspectors found, November 2023
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, person-centred care, with some medicines and bathroom equipment records needing attention.
This was an unannounced inspection on 19 October 2023. Two inspectors spoke with people living at the home, staff and a visiting professional. They observed care and checked care plans, staff records, meeting notes and quality checks.
The home was rated Good overall. Inspectors found that people felt safe, had enough staff support and were helped to make choices, stay independent and take part in community activities. Care was described as personal and focused on each person's routines and interests.
This report only inspected Safe and Well-led. The other areas were not inspected at this visit, so their previous ratings were used. The overall Good rating has not changed since the previous rating, published in December 2017.
Personal choice and independence
People could choose their routines, activities and meals. Risk assessments helped them use public transport, access the community and manage some medicines themselves.
“People were able to make choices about their day to day lives and how they wished to spend their time.” from the report
Safe staffing and support
Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's care needs and support social activities. New staff had checks and worked alongside experienced staff before working independently.
“There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs.” from the report
Positive atmosphere
People looked relaxed and said they felt safe and well cared for. Inspectors saw kind interactions and found staff to be motivated and cheerful.
“Staff were well motivated and cheerful which provided a happy and comfortable atmosphere for people to live in.” from the report
Good management and checks
The manager knew people well and was approachable. Regular checks identified shortfalls and records showed that improvements were made in good time.
“The provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of the service.” from the report
Medicine stock records
needs fixingMedicine administration records were signed, but separate stock records did not always match the amounts recorded as received. The manager said this would be investigated.
“Records we looked at did not always correspond to amounts recorded as received on the administration records.” from the report
Bathroom equipment
minorSome bathroom equipment needed replacing to support good infection control. The manager gave assurances that some items would be replaced.
“However, some equipment in bathrooms would benefit from replacement to ensure good infection control was promoted.” from the report
- 01What action has been taken to make sure medicine stock records match the administration records?
- 02Which bathroom equipment needed replacing, and has that work now been completed?
- 03What are the current ratings and findings for Effective, Caring and Responsive from the previous comprehensive inspection?
- 04How are people supported to keep using local community facilities, public transport, work and clubs?
- 05How can residents and families raise concerns with the manager, and how are those concerns followed up?
This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 3 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Clevedon House
3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- November 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- October 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Freeways
4 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.