Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Berkley Care Group

Cedar Mews

Cedar Mews Care Home, 67 Hallam Fields Road, Birstall, Leicester, LE4 3LX

Goodpublished 4 November 2023, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Risks were assessed, staffing was reviewed, medicines were managed safely after recent changes, and the home was clean with suitable infection control.
Effective?
Good
People's health, nutrition and hydration needs were assessed and monitored. Staff had suitable training and worked with health professionals, although some mental capacity assessments needed more detail.
Caring?
Good
The report does not give a new rating for Caring. Inspectors reported that people and relatives were positive about the friendly atmosphere, choice and involvement in daily life.
Responsive?
Good
The report does not give a new rating for Responsive. People were involved in decisions about their care and activities, and their suggestions were recorded as acted upon.
Well-led?
Good
The management team monitored quality, worked with other agencies and acted on medicine shortfalls. Staff described a positive culture, and people's and relatives' views were sought.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2023

Cedar Mews is rated Good; inspectors found safe, effective and well-led care, with some improvements still being completed.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 25 September 2023. Three inspectors and an Expert by Experience spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and a visiting professional. They reviewed care records, medicines records, staff files and quality records.

The home was rated Good overall. Safe, Effective and Well-led were each rated Good. Inspectors found that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm, received suitable health and personal care, and were supported by a management team that monitored and improved the service.

There had been recent problems with some medicines, creams and dietary supplements not always being given as prescribed. The home had introduced an action plan and inspectors found improvements. Some mental capacity assessments also needed more detail, and the manager had agreed to improve them.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People told inspectors they felt safe and staff responded to requests for help. Risk assessments and emergency evacuation plans were in place.

    People told us they felt safe at Cedar Mews.from the report
  • Choice and independence

    People were involved in care planning and could choose when to get up, go to bed, eat meals and spend their day.

    People told us they made day to day decisions about their lives, choosing the time they got up and went to bed, where they ate their meals, and how they spent their day.from the report
  • Food and health support

    People's food and drink needs were met, with choices about meals and where to eat. Staff monitored health and worked with health professionals.

    People's nutritional and hydration needs were met.from the report
  • Positive leadership

    The management team worked with other agencies, listened to feedback and shared learning with staff. Staff described teamwork and an open culture.

    A proactive approach to seeking staff feedback and the provision of support, encouraged an open and inclusive culture for staff.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine improvements were still recent

    needs fixing

    Audits before the inspection found that prescribed creams and dietary supplements were not always given. Inspectors found improvements, but families should check how the action plan is kept under review.

    A recent quality and monitoring visit carried out by commissioners identified shortfalls in some aspects of medicine management.from the report
  • Some capacity assessments lacked detail

    needs fixing

    Some records did not fully explain how a person's mental capacity had been assessed. The manager had committed to improving the detail in future assessments.

    We found some assessments could be improved to provide greater detail to show how people's capacity had been determined.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes were made after the medicine audits, and how do you check that creams and dietary supplements are now always given as prescribed?
  2. 02How will you make sure mental capacity assessments explain clearly how each decision about a person's care was reached?
  3. 03Which areas of care were not inspected during this visit, and what evidence can you provide about Caring and Responsive care?
  4. 04How are residents and relatives' suggestions about activities and daily care recorded and followed up?
  5. 05How do you involve relatives and health professionals when a person's health or capacity changes?

This was a focused inspection covering Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not given new ratings, and the report says ratings for key questions not inspected were carried over. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Cedar Mews

2 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Cedar Mews

  2. November 2017Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. January 2017

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 6 January 2017.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Leicester

Damascus House

Leicester, LE4 · 1.9 km
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

George Hythe House

Leicester, LE4 · 2.0 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 17 months agocare home

Croft House

Thurcaston, LE7 · 2.0 km
Good
Residential
Rated 8 years agocare home

Diamond House

Leicester, LE4 · 2.3 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Hadrian House

Leicester, LE4 · 2.5 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home