Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Hamberley Care Homes

Brookview Neurological Centre-Inspire Neurocare (Worcester)

195 Oldbury Road, Worcester, WR2 6AS

Goodpublished 3 March 2026, 5 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Rated Requires Improvement, improved from Inadequate, but inspectors found continued breaches in care planning, risk monitoring and governance.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 09 January 2024. Inspectors checked Safe, Effective and Well-led. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and a visiting professional, and reviewed care plans, medicine records, staffing information and audits.

The home had improved since the last inspection. Medicines were managed more safely, staff training and recruitment processes had improved, and people had more activities, community access and involvement in the service.

However, care plans were not always followed. Inspectors found problems with repositioning records, seating guidance, oral care, welfare checks and fluid monitoring. The systems used by managers did not reliably identify these problems.

The overall rating changed from Inadequate to Requires Improvement. Regulations 9, 12 and 17 were still breached, so further improvement is needed before the home can be considered consistently safe and well run.

What inspectors praised
  • Medicines

    Medicines management had improved significantly. Records showed medicines were given as prescribed, with regular checks and audits.

    Since our last inspection there had been significant improvements in the management and processes of medicines.from the report
  • Staff skills

    The provider had improved nursing staff training and ensured clinical support was available for people with complex needs such as epilepsy and PEG care.

    Since our last inspection the provider had ensured nursing staff had attended the relevant training courses in order to meet the care needs of people living at the service.from the report
  • Activities and community access

    People had more opportunities outside the home, vocational opportunities and activities linked to their interests.

    Activities, community access and community links had developed and people were experiencing more vocational opportunities and their wishes and hobbies were being explored.from the report
  • Environment

    The home was clean, spacious and accessible for people using wheelchairs. People had personalised their rooms.

    The environment was clean, spacious in design and accommodated people's needs.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Care plans not always followed

    serious

    Inspectors found that some care was not delivered as written. This included repositioning, specific seating guidance and overnight welfare checks, creating a risk of harm.

    Systems were not robust to monitor and mitigate risks to the health, safety and welfare of people using the service and lessons had not always been learnt.from the report
  • Oral care

    serious

    One person's care plan required oral care four times a day, but records showed support was provided once a day. Inspectors said this put the person at risk of infection.

    A person did not receive oral health support in line with their oral health care plan which put them at risk of infections.from the report
  • Management checks

    serious

    Audits were being completed but did not reliably identify care that was not being delivered as planned. Some problems found at earlier inspections had still not been resolved.

    Measures to monitor the quality of the care provided were not always effective, this meant the management team did not have a full oversight of issues at the service to always drive improvements.from the report
  • Fluid records

    needs fixing

    Fluid charts had inconsistent entries, making it difficult to tell whether people had reached their daily fluid targets. The provider said it would review and improve the charts.

    Further improvements were required with monitoring people's fluids.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure repositioning, seating guidance and nightly welfare checks are completed exactly as set out in each person's care plan?
  2. 02What has changed to ensure oral care is provided at the frequency set out in the care plan?
  3. 03How are you checking fluid charts so that each person's daily fluid target can be confirmed?
  4. 04What changes have been made to audits so they identify missed care rather than only confirming that checks have been completed?
  5. 05Who is currently responsible for the home while the manager is going through the CQC registration process?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and the overall rating used ratings from the last inspection for those questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Brookview Neurological Centre-Inspire Neurocare (Worcester)

4 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. February 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Brookview Neurological Centre-Inspire Neurocare (Worcester)

  2. November 2023Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. August 2023Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2021Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2020

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 30 January 2020.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Worcester

Constable House

Worcester, WR2 · 0.6 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Henwick Grange

Worcester, WR2 · 1.1 km
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated 10 months agocare home

Phoenix House

Worcester, WR2 · 1.2 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

95 Bromyard Road

Worcester, WR2 · 1.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home