Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Lansglade Homes

Beacon House

12 Linden Road, Bedford, MK40 2DA

Goodpublished 6 May 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2023

Beacon House rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found risks to people's safety, consent and care records, with warning notices issued.

This was an unannounced inspection on 19 October 2023. Three inspectors and an Expert by Experience spoke with people, relatives and staff. They reviewed care records, medicines records, recruitment files and management checks.

Inspectors found important gaps in risk assessments and monitoring. These included missing choking assessments, incorrect pressure mattress settings, gaps in repositioning and food and fluid charts, and incomplete wound records. Some medicines guidance did not explain when different doses should be given.

The home had enough staff during the inspection, used safe recruitment processes and people said they felt safe. Staff knew people well, and relatives and staff spoke positively about the management. The overall rating changed from Good at the last inspection in 2017 to Requires Improvement. The provider must send an action plan and progress will be monitored.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff knew how to recognise abuse and how to report concerns.

    I am safe here, everything I need gets done.from the report
  • Staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors observed enough staff to meet people's needs in a timely way. Recruitment checks were in place, and staff were described as regular and familiar with people's needs.

    Safe recruitment practices were in place to ensure only staff suitable to work with vulnerable people were employed.from the report
  • Training and healthcare

    Staff had induction, ongoing training, supervision and appraisals. People could access healthcare professionals when needed.

    People had access to the healthcare services they required.from the report
  • Environment and food

    The home was well maintained, with communal areas, personalised rooms and an accessible garden. People gave positive feedback about the food.

    The home environment supported people's well-being. It was pleasantly decorated and well maintained.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Pressure-area and choking risks

    serious

    Some people did not have the required choking risk assessment. Repositioning records had large gaps, and eight pressure mattresses were set incorrectly for people's weights.

    Pressure mattress settings did not always match people's weights. We observed 8 mattresses that were not set correctly according to people's weights.from the report
  • Food and fluid monitoring

    serious

    Food and fluid charts had significant gaps. Some people regularly did not meet their fluid targets, and there was not enough guidance about what staff should do.

    Records showed people regularly did not meet their target with some people having less than half the required target.from the report
  • Consent and restrictive practices

    serious

    The home did not always record the required legal decisions before using covert medicines or bedrails. This was a breach of the Mental Capacity Act requirements.

    A person had been receiving covert medicines. The covert procedure had been already implemented without a DoLS or best interests' decision prior to this being commenced.from the report
  • Medicines guidance

    needs fixing

    Instructions for as-needed medicines did not explain when to give different doses. Inspectors made a recommendation to update this practice.

    Where PRN protocols were in place there was no guidance regarding variable doses.from the report
  • Weak quality checks

    serious

    Audits did not identify several problems with care records, pressure care, mattress settings and incident reporting. This was a breach of good governance.

    Quality checks and audits needed to be strengthened to ensure areas for improvement were identified and acted upon swiftly.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What has been done to ensure every person with swallowing difficulties has a current choking risk assessment?
  2. 02How do you now check that pressure mattresses are set correctly and that repositioning is recorded for every person who needs it?
  3. 03What changes have been made to food and fluid monitoring, including what staff do when someone misses their target?
  4. 04How are covert medicines and bedrails now authorised and recorded under the Mental Capacity Act?
  5. 05What action has been taken in response to the warning notices, and how are audits now checking that improvements are sustained?

This inspection widened to cover Safe, Effective and Well-led after concerns about consent; Caring and Responsive were not inspected in this report, and the report says ratings for uninspected questions used the previous inspection ratings. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Beacon House

3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. November 2023Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Beacon House

  2. November 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Lansglade Homes Limited

4 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Henrietta House

Bedford, MK40
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Lansglade House

Bedford, MK40
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

The Mallards

Bedford, MK40
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Bedford

Oasis House

Bedford, MK40 · 0.0 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home

Annandale Lodge

Bedford, MK40 · 0.0 km
Good
Nursing
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Henrietta House

Bedford, MK40 · 0.1 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

The Mallards

Bedford, MK40 · 0.1 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

Lansglade House

Bedford, MK40 · 0.2 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained