CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Lansglade Homes
Beacon House
12 Linden Road, Bedford, MK40 2DA
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, November 2023
Beacon House rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found risks to people's safety, consent and care records, with warning notices issued.
This was an unannounced inspection on 19 October 2023. Three inspectors and an Expert by Experience spoke with people, relatives and staff. They reviewed care records, medicines records, recruitment files and management checks.
Inspectors found important gaps in risk assessments and monitoring. These included missing choking assessments, incorrect pressure mattress settings, gaps in repositioning and food and fluid charts, and incomplete wound records. Some medicines guidance did not explain when different doses should be given.
The home had enough staff during the inspection, used safe recruitment processes and people said they felt safe. Staff knew people well, and relatives and staff spoke positively about the management. The overall rating changed from Good at the last inspection in 2017 to Requires Improvement. The provider must send an action plan and progress will be monitored.
People felt safe
People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff knew how to recognise abuse and how to report concerns.
“I am safe here, everything I need gets done.” from the report
Staffing and recruitment
Inspectors observed enough staff to meet people's needs in a timely way. Recruitment checks were in place, and staff were described as regular and familiar with people's needs.
“Safe recruitment practices were in place to ensure only staff suitable to work with vulnerable people were employed.” from the report
Training and healthcare
Staff had induction, ongoing training, supervision and appraisals. People could access healthcare professionals when needed.
“People had access to the healthcare services they required.” from the report
Environment and food
The home was well maintained, with communal areas, personalised rooms and an accessible garden. People gave positive feedback about the food.
“The home environment supported people's well-being. It was pleasantly decorated and well maintained.” from the report
Pressure-area and choking risks
seriousSome people did not have the required choking risk assessment. Repositioning records had large gaps, and eight pressure mattresses were set incorrectly for people's weights.
“Pressure mattress settings did not always match people's weights. We observed 8 mattresses that were not set correctly according to people's weights.” from the report
Food and fluid monitoring
seriousFood and fluid charts had significant gaps. Some people regularly did not meet their fluid targets, and there was not enough guidance about what staff should do.
“Records showed people regularly did not meet their target with some people having less than half the required target.” from the report
Consent and restrictive practices
seriousThe home did not always record the required legal decisions before using covert medicines or bedrails. This was a breach of the Mental Capacity Act requirements.
“A person had been receiving covert medicines. The covert procedure had been already implemented without a DoLS or best interests' decision prior to this being commenced.” from the report
Medicines guidance
needs fixingInstructions for as-needed medicines did not explain when to give different doses. Inspectors made a recommendation to update this practice.
“Where PRN protocols were in place there was no guidance regarding variable doses.” from the report
Weak quality checks
seriousAudits did not identify several problems with care records, pressure care, mattress settings and incident reporting. This was a breach of good governance.
“Quality checks and audits needed to be strengthened to ensure areas for improvement were identified and acted upon swiftly.” from the report
- 01What has been done to ensure every person with swallowing difficulties has a current choking risk assessment?
- 02How do you now check that pressure mattresses are set correctly and that repositioning is recorded for every person who needs it?
- 03What changes have been made to food and fluid monitoring, including what staff do when someone misses their target?
- 04How are covert medicines and bedrails now authorised and recorded under the Mental Capacity Act?
- 05What action has been taken in response to the warning notices, and how are audits now checking that improvements are sustained?
This inspection widened to cover Safe, Effective and Well-led after concerns about consent; Caring and Responsive were not inspected in this report, and the report says ratings for uninspected questions used the previous inspection ratings. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Beacon House
3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- November 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2020Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- November 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- July 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- June 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 November 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Lansglade Homes Limited
4 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.