Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Dignus Healthcare

39 School Lane

39 School Lane, Exhall, Coventry, CV7 9GE

Goodpublished 14 February 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Medicines, staffing, recruitment, infection control and risk management had improved, although some garden safety risks still needed reducing.
Effective?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its rating was carried forward from the previous inspection.
Caring?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its rating was carried forward from the previous inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its rating was carried forward from the previous inspection.
Well-led?
Good
The home had a clearer management structure, regular quality checks and a more open culture. People and staff were involved in developing the home and care.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Rated Good; inspectors found safer, more person-centred care, although some garden safety risks still needed attention.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 17 January 2024. Two inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and a health and social care professional. They also reviewed care plans, medicines records, recruitment checks, safety records and management checks.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that people were protected from abuse, medicines were managed safely, staffing levels were sufficient and the home was following the Mental Capacity Act. People were involved in decisions about their care and the running of the home.

The inspection followed a Requires Improvement rating in August 2023. The provider had been in breach of several regulations then. Inspectors found enough improvement for the home to no longer be in breach.

What inspectors praised
  • People's choices

    People were encouraged to make their own decisions and staff used the least restrictive approach. Care plans and capacity assessments supported people's rights.

    People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests;from the report
  • Safer medicines

    Medicines records showed medicines were given as prescribed. Staff were trained and assessed as competent, and guidance for medicines given when needed had improved.

    People were now supported to receive their medicines safely.from the report
  • Staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough suitable staff and safe recruitment checks. Staff received induction and worked alongside more experienced colleagues.

    The provider ensured there were sufficient numbers of suitable staff.from the report
  • Better leadership

    The provider had introduced regular checks, action plans and a learning culture. People and staff said their views were listened to.

    The provider now had a clear management structure that monitored the quality of care to drive improvements in service delivery.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Garden safety

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found that equipment and stored items in the garden could still create avoidable risks. The registered manager said this would be addressed without delay.

    There was no evidence of harm to people, but we found some risks could be further reduced. This included in relation to the equipment and storage of items in the garden area.from the report
  • Staff vacancies

    minor

    The home had recent staff vacancies, although inspectors found there were enough staff at the time of the visit. New staff were due to start.

    The leadership at the home were being supported by the provider to progress recent staff vacancies and new staff were due to commence employment.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has the equipment and storage in the garden now been checked and made safe?
  2. 02How many staff vacancies are still open, and how are people's needs covered while new staff start?
  3. 03How are checks on medicines, incidents and care quality recorded and followed up?
  4. 04How will people continue to be involved in their care plans and decisions about the home?
  5. 05What were the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive at the previous inspection, and are any further improvements planned?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of 39 School Lane

3 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2024Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at 39 School Lane

  2. August 2023Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2021Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2020

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 August 2020.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Dignus Healthcare Limited

13 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

School House

Walsall, WS3
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Arden Croft

Coventry, CV7
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Brookfield

Coventry, CV6
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Byron Court

Nottingham, NG5
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

Carisbrooke House

Nottingham, NG3
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 5 months agocare home

Chance Drive

Smethwick, B66
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Coventry

Fairfield

Coventry, CV7 · 0.9 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 10 months agocare home

Shirlett Close

Coventry, CV2 · 1.5 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home

Derwent Road

Bedworth, CV12 · 1.7 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home