Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Lifeways Community Care

202 Weston Road

202 Weston Road, Meir, Stoke-on-Trent, ST3 6EE

Goodpublished 27 January 2025, 19 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2024

202 Weston Road was rated Inadequate and placed in special measures after inspectors found serious safety, care and leadership failures.

Inspectors visited without notice on 25 and 30 January 2024. They spoke with relatives, staff and professionals, observed care, and checked care, medicine, staff and management records.

The home was not always safe. Risks were not properly managed, medicine records were incomplete, some staff lacked the skills needed, and infection control and the building needed attention. People were not always supported in line with their care plans or the Mental Capacity Act.

The home was also not well led. There was no registered manager in post, quality checks had not led to improvement, and people were not always treated in an empowering or person-centred way. The ratings were Inadequate for Safe and Well-led, and Requires Improvement for Effective.

The overall rating fell from Good at the previous inspection, published in October 2019. The home is in special measures, and the provider must send an action plan while the CQC and local authority monitor progress.

What inspectors praised
  • Food and drink

    Inspectors found that people were supported to eat and drink enough. Food preferences and how people liked to eat were recorded.

    People were supported to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced diet.from the report
  • Safe recruitment

    The provider completed checks before employing staff, which helped assess whether they were suitable to work at the home.

    People were supported by staff who were safely recruited to work at the home.from the report
  • Visitors

    People could receive visitors without restrictions during the inspection.

    People were able to receive visitors without restrictions in line with best practice guidance.from the report
  • Some immediate action

    After inspectors raised concerns, the provider put protocols in place for as-required medicines and completed further building and safety checks.

    Following our first day of inspection we requested the provider took action to ensure the required protocols were in placefrom the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unmanaged risks

    serious

    Some health and behaviour-related risks did not have clear, up-to-date guidance. An incident occurred after staff did not follow the protocol for a specific health need.

    This placed the person at risk of harm.from the report
  • Medicine safety

    serious

    Medicine administration records had missing signatures. There were no protocols for some as-required medicines, and a broken thermometer was not replaced.

    People's medicine administration records (MAR) contained missing signatures, which meant we could not be assured people had received their medicines as prescribed.from the report
  • Premises and infection control

    serious

    Mould, rust, strong smells and incomplete cleaning schedules were found. One bathroom was out of use, and the layout did not always meet people's needs.

    People were not always protected from the risk of infection as staff were not consistently following safe infection prevention and control practices.from the report
  • Staff skills and treatment

    serious

    Some staff said they lacked suitable training, especially for behaviours they found difficult to manage. Inspectors heard shouting and saw people being told to be quiet.

    Staff approach to supporting people during incidents was not effective.from the report
  • Limited activities and independence

    serious

    There was little evidence of meaningful activities or support to develop people's independence. Inspectors saw people sitting for long periods while staff talked elsewhere.

    There was no record of the progress or completion of this goal.from the report
  • Weak leadership

    serious

    There was no registered manager in post and oversight was not robust. Audits identified problems but did not consistently lead to action or learning.

    The provider did not have an effective management structure.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate changes have been made to risk assessments and staff guidance for each person's health and behaviour needs?
  2. 02How are medicine signatures, as-required medicine protocols and medicine storage temperatures now checked?
  3. 03What training and supervision have staff received to support people safely during incidents?
  4. 04Who is managing the home now, and how is the provider checking that improvements are being maintained?
  5. 05What regular activities and support for independence are now available for each person?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and the report says ratings for uninspected questions carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 April 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of 202 Weston Road

4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. April 2024Inadequatecurrent rating
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at 202 Weston Road

  2. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. September 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. August 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 27 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Lifeways Orchard Care Limited

1 other service on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Nearby

Other care homes near Stoke-on-Trent

Weston House

Stoke-on-Trent, ST3 · 0.6 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

The Beeches

Stoke-on-Trent, ST3 · 0.8 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

Four Seasons

Stoke-on-Trent, ST3 · 0.9 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home

Fernlea

Stoke-on-Trent, ST3 · 1.4 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 4 months agocare home