CQC report explained · a residential care home
Wythall Residential Home
241 Station Road, Wythall, Birmingham, B47 6ET
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, September 2023
Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind care and some progress, but serious weaknesses remained in safeguarding, medicines and management checks.
This was an unannounced focused follow-up inspection on 14 June 2023 and 06 July 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and health professionals. They reviewed care plans, medicine records, staff recruitment files and management records.
The home remained Requires Improvement for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that people generally felt safe and spoke positively about staff, but safeguarding concerns had not always been reported properly. Medicines were not always given, stored or recorded safely. Food storage and infection control also needed improvement.
Some progress had been made since the previous inspection. The home had introduced an audit schedule, an action plan and a planned electronic system. However, the provider remained in breach of regulations and had not fully met the requirements of an earlier warning notice. CQC will request another action plan and monitor progress with the local authority.
People felt safe
People and relatives gave positive feedback about the staff and support. People said they felt safe living in the home.
“People told us they felt safe living at Wythall Residential Home.” from the report
Staffing during visits
Inspectors saw enough staff to provide safe care during their visits, and staff responded to people's needs promptly. Recruitment checks were also in place.
“During our inspection visits we saw there were enough staff to provide safe care and treatment.” from the report
Choice and least restriction
The home was working within the Mental Capacity Act principles. People were supported to make decisions and care was provided in the least restrictive way possible.
“People were supported to make decisions when they were able to.” from the report
Some management improvements
The provider had introduced an audit schedule with named responsibilities and was bringing in an electronic system to support records, audits and communication.
“The provider had introduced a schedule of audits to monitor the performance of the home which was accompanied by an action plan giving named staff responsibility for specific tasks.” from the report
Safeguarding was not always escalated
seriousTwo potential safeguarding concerns had not been referred to the appropriate external agencies or CQC when required. This meant inspectors could not be assured that people were fully protected.
“During the inspection we reviewed 2 potential incidents of safeguarding concern. However, the concerns were not escalated externally to appropriate agencies for further investigation, or to CQC as required.” from the report
Medicines were not always managed safely
seriousOne person did not receive a prescribed medicine for seven weeks without a recorded reason. Inspectors also found unlocked medicines and thickener, inaccurate stock records and incomplete records for medicines given as required.
“One person had not received 1 of their medicines as prescribed for 7 weeks. There was no documented evidence why this medicine had stopped.” from the report
Management checks missed problems
seriousAudits did not always identify the problems inspectors found or explain why repeated medicine errors had happened. Accidents and incidents were not consistently analysed for patterns.
“Systems and processes were not fully embedded to identify and monitor the quality of the service and drive improvements.” from the report
Food storage needed improvement
needs fixingInspectors found out-of-date food and food that was not clearly labelled or stored in airtight containers. The home's own checks had not found these issues.
“We observed food items that had exceeded their use by date and food items which had not been clearly labelled or stored in airtight containers.” from the report
No registered manager was in post
needs fixingThe home did not yet have a registered manager, although a manager had applied to register and was expected to move permanently to the home.
“The service remained without a registered manager; however, management support was being provided internally by experienced managers.” from the report
- 01What checks now make sure every medicine is given as prescribed, stored securely and recorded correctly, including medicines given as required?
- 02How are safeguarding concerns escalated to the local authority and CQC, including concerns that arise outside normal management hours?
- 03How do your audits identify the root causes of medicine errors and analyse accidents or incidents for repeated patterns?
- 04Has the manager's application to become registered with CQC been approved, and who is responsible for the home until then?
- 05How do you cover vacancies and sickness, especially at weekends when relatives reported that staffing could feel more chaotic?
This was a focused follow-up inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other three key question ratings were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Wythall Residential Home
6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- September 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- June 2019Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2016Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- April 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 22 December 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.