Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Pinnacle Care

Wolston Grange

Coalpit Lane, Lawford Heath, Rugby, CV23 9HJ

Goodpublished 16 July 2025, 13 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

Rated Good overall; inspectors found kind, effective care, but medicines and some risk records were not always safe.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 11 December 2023. Inspectors spoke with 8 people, 6 staff members, the manager and the provider. They reviewed 9 people's care records, medicines records, staff recruitment files and quality checks.

The overall rating was Good. Effective and well-led were rated Good. Safe remained Requires Improvement because some medicines were not managed or recorded correctly, and some individual risks were not recorded consistently. The report says the home was no longer in breach of the regulations found at the previous inspection.

People told inspectors they felt safe and were pleased with the care. Staff were described as kind and attentive, and inspectors found enough staff. The home was clean, people had access to health care, and managers had made improvements to audits and action plans.

Fire safety improvements were still being managed, including replacing fire doors and improving signs. The manager said action had also been taken after the inspection to address medicines, risk records and other recording issues.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and attentive staff

    Staff knew people well and were described as kind and attentive. People spoke positively about the care and said they felt safe.

    People were supported by staff who knew them well and staff were kind and attentive.from the report
  • Enough suitable staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Recruitment included checks such as references and DBS checks.

    There were enough staff on duty to support and meet people's needs.from the report
  • Improved management checks

    The provider and manager had introduced more regular and structured checks. These produced action plans, and inspectors saw evidence that actions had been completed or were being progressed.

    Completed audits resulted in action plans and those actions were compiled onto a 'master' action plan for the registered manager to work from.from the report
  • Good support with health and daily needs

    Staff supported people to access health services and followed advice about modified diets and choking risks. Care plans were updated when people's needs changed.

    People's needs were assessed and care and support was delivered in line with current standards to achieve effective outcomes.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines were not always managed safely

    serious

    A pain patch was not applied as directed, a controlled medicine was not accurately counted, and improvements were needed to labelling and discarding medicines. The manager said these matters were addressed after the visit.

    People were supported to receive their medicines in a way that was not always safe.from the report
  • Some risk records were inconsistent

    needs fixing

    Some people's risks were better recorded than others. Inspectors said more guidance was needed for risks including diabetes, catheter care and fire safety for people who smoked or used electronic cigarettes.

    We found no evidence of harm to people, but risks to some people could be further reduced.from the report
  • Fire safety work was still under way

    needs fixing

    The provider was still updating or replacing fire doors and improving signs. The fire authority was being kept informed and the home had increased fire drills and fire warden training.

    The provider had timescales to make improvements to the fire safety of the home.from the report
  • Some people wanted more meal choice

    minor

    Most people enjoyed their meals, but some said there was not always a choice. Meal feedback was discussed at regular meetings.

    Most people told us they enjoyed their meals, some people said there was not always a choice.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What checks now confirm that pain patches are applied as directed and controlled medicines are counted accurately?
  2. 02How will you keep risk assessments up to date for diabetes, catheter care and people who smoke or use electronic cigarettes?
  3. 03What is the timetable for replacing or updating the fire doors and signs, and what has been completed?
  4. 04How do you make sure people have a meaningful choice of meals?
  5. 05How are the new medicine and record-keeping audits checked to make sure improvements continue?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and the overall rating was calculated using previous ratings for the questions not inspected. This explanation was written from the published report of 30 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Wolston Grange

6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. December 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Wolston Grange

  2. January 2023Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2019Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2019Inadequatedown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. July 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. July 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  15. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 20 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Pinnacle Care Ltd

3 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Manor House

Rugby, CV22
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

The Red House

Rugby, CV22
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 5 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Rugby

Dewar Close

Rugby, CV22 · 4.4 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 13 months agocare home

Manor House

Rugby, CV22 · 4.5 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Bilton House

Rugby, CV22 · 4.5 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 5 months agocare home

Daventry Road

Rugby, CV22 · 4.9 km
Good
Residential
Rated 4 months agocare home