CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Windsar Care
Windsor Care Centre
Burlington Avenue, Slough, SL1 2LD
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, October 2023
Windsor Care Centre is rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found important safety and record-keeping problems, although significant improvements mean it is no longer in special measures.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 6 July 2023. Inspectors reviewed the Safe, Effective and Well-led areas. They spoke with people, a relative and staff, observed care, checked care and medicines records, and reviewed training, recruitment, complaints and audits.
The home had improved staffing, training, infection control, food choices and communication. People said they felt safe and that staff responded quickly. However, medicines were not always managed safely, fire risks were not always followed up, and pressure mattress settings were not checked properly.
The home remained in breach of Regulation 12 for safe care and treatment and Regulation 17 for good governance. Its overall rating improved from Inadequate to Requires Improvement, and it was no longer in special measures. Effective remained Requires Improvement. Caring and Responsive were not inspected in this visit, so their previous ratings carried over.
Staffing and recruitment
Inspectors saw enough staff on duty and said people received help promptly. Recruitment checks had also improved.
“On the day of the inspection, we saw there were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs.” from the report
Safeguarding
People said they felt safe. Staff knew how to report concerns and safeguarding training was up to date.
“People were supported by staff that knew how to raise safeguarding concerns.” from the report
Food and choice
People were offered meal choices and could change their mind. Staff supported people with food and drinks in a dignified way.
“Throughout the inspection we saw people were supported with nutrition and hydration in a dignified way.” from the report
Improved culture
Communication from the management team had improved. Staff said they felt supported and able to raise concerns.
“Staff felt empowered to speak up and call out poor practice.” from the report
Medicines
seriousSystems did not always ensure medicines continued when people temporarily left the home. Guidance and records for PRN medicines were incomplete, and the legal process for some covert medicines had not been fully followed.
“Where people temporarily left the home, the provider did not have systems in place to ensure the continuity of medicines administration.” from the report
Fire safety
seriousFire drill records did not consistently show who attended, what they did or what action was needed. A faulty emergency lighting issue was recorded without remedial action.
“The provider's auditing systems were not used effectively to manage fire risks and we identified some missed opportunities where learning could have occurred.” from the report
Pressure damage risk
seriousThere was no process to check that pressure mattresses were set correctly. Inspectors found one mattress set at a much higher weight than the person's actual weight.
“There was no process in place to ensure mattress settings were checked and correct.” from the report
Quality checks and records
seriousAudits did not identify all the problems found during the inspection. Some records contained conflicting or incorrect information, including risk assessments.
“Audits of medicines management and care plans were still not fully effective.” from the report
- 01What checks now make sure medicines are continued when a person temporarily leaves the home?
- 02How do you decide when PRN medicines are needed, and how do you record their effect?
- 03What action has been taken on the fire safety recommendations and faulty emergency lighting identified in the report?
- 04How are pressure mattress settings checked and recorded for each person?
- 05How do you check that care plans, risk assessments and medicines audits are complete and accurate?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Windsor Care Centre
3 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- October 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingup from InadequateSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2022Inadequatedown from GoodSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- June 2018GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2017
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 6 March 2017.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Windsar Care Limited
2 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.