CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Willow View Care
Willow View Care Home
1 Norton Court, Norton Road, Stockton-on-Tees, TS20 2BL
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, March 2024
Rated Requires Improvement overall; Safe was Inadequate and the home remains in special measures because inspectors found continuing risks.
Inspectors visited the home unannounced on 30 January and 8 February 2024. They reviewed care and medicine records, staff recruitment files and management records. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care and toured the home.
The home had improved since its previous Inadequate rating. Staffing levels were suitable, consent records had improved, staff were working better with health professionals, and people described staff as kind and caring. Activities, complaints handling and care planning had also improved.
However, important safety problems remained. Risk records were not always updated or followed, call bells were inaccessible, medicine records were unreliable, infection control guidance was not followed, and some people did not receive enough fluids or their required modified diets. The home's checks had not found or dealt with all these problems.
The overall rating changed from Inadequate to Requires Improvement. Caring and Responsive were rated Good, but Safe remained Inadequate and Effective and Well-led were Requires Improvement. The home remains in special measures and is due to be reviewed through another inspection.
Kind and respectful care
People and relatives spoke positively about staff. Inspectors found that people's dignity, privacy and independence were promoted.
“People were treated with dignity and respect, and their independence was promoted.” from the report
More activities
A new activities coordinator had created a weekly programme, with individual time for people who preferred not to join group activities.
“A new activities coordinator had been recruited and a variety of activities were on offer.” from the report
Suitable staffing levels
There were enough staff on duty, supported by a new tool to help calculate staffing according to people's needs.
“There was a suitable number of staff on duty.” from the report
Improved consent arrangements
Signed consent forms, mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were now recorded where needed.
“Consent to care and treatment was now in line with law and guidance.” from the report
Better professional working
Staff were making timely referrals when they had concerns about people's health and wellbeing.
“Where concerns about people's health and well-being were identified, referrals to relevant professionals, such as the falls team, had been made in a timely manner.” from the report
Risks and call bells
seriousRisk assessments were not always updated or followed. Some call bells were inaccessible and other environmental risks had not been dealt with.
“We found trailing wires which could pose a ligature risk and nurse calls bell which were inaccessible to people.” from the report
Medicines
seriousRecords did not always match prescribers' instructions. Some bowel medicines were not given promptly and medicine audits did not reliably identify problems.
“Medicines prescribed to assist with bowel movements had not always been given in a timely manner.” from the report
Infection control
seriousDuring a Covid outbreak, information about positive cases was conflicting. People who had tested positive were seen in communal areas and staff did not always follow protective equipment guidance.
“People who were Covid positive were observed in communal areas.” from the report
Food and fluids
seriousSome people did not receive enough fluids, and staff did not always follow instructions for modified diets intended to reduce risks.
“Daily fluid targets were in place for people, but these had not always been achieved as not enough fluids had been provided by staff.” from the report
Weak quality checks
needs fixingThe home's audits and checks did not find all the shortfalls. Actions after some incidents and identified problems were not always completed promptly.
“Some of the quality assurance processes needed further development.” from the report
Recruitment records
needs fixingRecruitment processes were not fully followed. Some files were incomplete, and appropriate risk assessments were not always in place after DBS checks.
“Some gaps in recruitment records remained.” from the report
- 01What has been done to make sure risk assessments are updated after a person's condition changes and that staff follow them?
- 02How are you checking that medicines are given according to prescriber instructions and that bowel medicines are not delayed?
- 03During an infection outbreak, how will you identify affected people and make sure staff follow protective equipment guidance?
- 04How do you monitor daily drinks and modified diets, and what action do you take when targets are missed?
- 05Which problems from this inspection have now been fixed, and how will the manager and provider prove that improvements are lasting?
This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, with records, observations, interviews and a tour of the home. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 March 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Willow View Care Home
7 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- March 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingup from InadequateSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2023Inadequatedown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- April 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2021Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- March 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- May 2019Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2018Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- May 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- April 2015
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 27 April 2015.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.