Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Boulevard Care

Willoughby House

Willoughby Road, Sutton-on-Sea, LN12 2NF

Requires improvementpublished 18 November 2024, 21 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Rated Good overall, but inspectors found leadership and quality checks needed improvement.

This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 8 January 2024. Inspectors visited the home, spoke with people, relatives, staff and professionals, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and quality records. The inspection activity ended on 19 January 2024.

The home was rated Good for Safe. Inspectors found enough suitably skilled staff, safe recruitment, good safeguarding knowledge and safe support with medicines. They also found kind care, respect for privacy and dignity, support with choices, and good links with health professionals.

The home was rated Requires Improvement for Well-led. Quality checks were not always effective, two alleged abuse notifications were not sent to CQC promptly, and some records needed updating. A new manager had started improvements, but some changes still needed to be fully put into practice.

The overall rating is Good, but this inspection did not check Caring, Effective or Responsive. Those ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection in 2019. The inspection was prompted partly by concerns about how people were treated, but inspectors found no evidence to support those concerns.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff knew how to recognise and report abuse, and understood people's risks.

    Staff had received training in abuse awareness and had a good knowledge of how to identify and report concerns.from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors found that staff provided compassionate care, respected privacy and dignity, and understood people's individual needs.

    People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people's privacy and dignity.from the report
  • Choice and independence

    People were supported to make choices about daily life, activities, food and their rooms. Staff helped people take part in interests and activities in the local community.

    Staff supported people to take part in activities and pursue their interests in their local area with people who had shared interests.from the report
  • Consistent staff team

    Low staff turnover meant people were supported by staff who knew them well. Inspectors found staff understood people's communication needs and care plans.

    Staff turnover was very low, which supported people to receive consistent care from staff who knew them well.from the report
  • Clean and welcoming home

    The home was clean and tidy, with safe infection control practices. Visitors were able to visit without restrictions.

    The service was very clean and tidy but still captured a 'homely' feel.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Delayed reporting of alleged abuse

    needs fixing

    Two notifications about alleged abuse were not reported to CQC promptly. The provider later submitted them and introduced new systems, but this shows an important weakness in oversight.

    This had resulted in 2 notifications of alleged abuse not being reported to CQC in a timely manner.from the report
  • Management oversight was incomplete

    needs fixing

    Some management posts were vacant and quality monitoring was limited to manager-level audits. Records and guidance for staff were not always up to date.

    The provider did not have a fully supported management structure as these posts were currently vacant.from the report
  • Some records and authorisations needed attention

    needs fixing

    The manager was reviewing care plans, risk assessments and medicines records. Some DoLS authorisations had expired while the home waited for reassessment.

    Some DoLS authorisations had expired and they were awaiting reassessment by the local authority.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now make sure alleged abuse and other notifiable events are reported to CQC promptly?
  2. 02Which management posts are still vacant, and who is responsible for checking the quality of care?
  3. 03Have all care plans, risk assessments, medicines records and staff guidance now been reviewed and updated?
  4. 04What is the current position on the expired DoLS authorisations, and how are people's rights protected while reassessment is awaited?
  5. 05How will you show that the new manager's improvement plan has been fully put into daily practice?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the 2019 inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Willoughby House

3 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Willoughby House

  2. June 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 July 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Boulevard Care Limited

5 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Boulevard House

Mablethorpe, LN12
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Ashby Court

Spilsby, PE23
Good
Residential
Rated 23 months agocare home

Bumblebee Lodge

Spilsby, PE23
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 23 months agocare home

Link House

Withern, LN13
Good
Residential
Rated 15 months agocare home

The Rowans

Louth, LN11
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Sutton-on-Sea

Skirbeck Lodge

Mablethorpe, LN12 · 0.5 km
Good
Residential
Rated 14 months agocare home

Boulevard House

Mablethorpe, LN12 · 3.0 km
Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained