Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Careline Lifestyles

Wilkinson Park

Harbottle, Rothbury, Morpeth, NE65 7DP

Goodpublished 10 November 2025, 9 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found some safety, activity, record-keeping and management weaknesses, with an ongoing breach of good governance.

This was an unannounced focused inspection. Inspectors visited on 27 June and 13 July 2023, spoke with people, relatives, staff and professionals, and checked care, medicines, staff and management records.

The home had enough staff to meet people's needs. Medicines systems had improved, safeguarding referrals were made correctly, and the home was following the Mental Capacity Act. However, risk management, premises security, infection control and cleanliness were not consistently effective.

Some people said they were bored. Records did not always show that activities, one-to-one time and community access were provided as planned. Records about care assessments, agency staff training and people's cooking skills were also incomplete.

The overall rating was Requires Improvement. The home remained in breach of Regulation 17 because its systems for checking quality, safety, records and people's outcomes were not effective enough. The caring question was not inspected, so its previous rating was used in the overall rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Staffing

    Inspectors found that staffing levels were sufficient to meet people's needs. Recruitment checks were completed before staff started work.

    There were sufficient staff deployed to meet people's needs.from the report
  • Mental Capacity Act

    The home was working within the Mental Capacity Act. Where people were deprived of their liberty, the necessary legal authorisations were in place.

    We found the service was working within the principles of the MCA and if needed, appropriate legal authorisations were in place to deprive a person of their liberty.from the report
  • Medicines

    The home had improved its medicines systems since the previous inspection. Inspectors found only minor recording shortfalls with topical medicines, which the manager said had been addressed.

    A system was in place to manage medicines safely.from the report
  • Progress towards independence

    Management gave examples of people gaining independence and wellbeing, including several people moving on to independent living.

    They also explained how several people had moved onto independent living.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Risk and premises safety

    serious

    Risk checks and monitoring were not fully effective. Inspectors found problems involving premises security, infection control, one person's room and visitor safety.

    An effective system to ensure risks were assessed, monitored, and managed was not fully in place.from the report
  • Activities and community access

    needs fixing

    Some people felt bored. Records did not always show meaningful occupation or one-to-one support, and vehicle and driver availability limited access to the local community.

    Some people told us they were bored.from the report
  • Agency staff training records

    needs fixing

    The home had a staff training system, but records did not always show that agency staff had completed training for the specific needs of residents.

    Records relating to agency staff did not always demonstrate what training they had undertaken to meet the specific needs of people who lived at the service.from the report
  • Weak quality monitoring

    serious

    The home had not done enough to monitor quality, safety, records and people's outcomes. This was an ongoing breach of Regulation 17.

    An effective system to monitor the quality and safety of the service was still not fully in place.from the report
  • Communication and complaints oversight

    needs fixing

    Several relatives wanted more communication. Complaints were recorded in care plans, but there was no central overview to identify patterns and trends.

    There was no central overview of the number or type of complaints or concerns that people had raised so any themes and trends could be analysed and monitored.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have you made to risk assessments, premises security, infection control and visitor safety since this inspection?
  2. 02How do you now prove that agency staff have completed training for the specific needs of people living here?
  3. 03How do you record and monitor one-to-one hours, meaningful activities and access to the local community?
  4. 04What central system now records complaints and concerns, and how do you use it to identify patterns?
  5. 05How are relatives and health and social care professionals now asked for feedback and kept informed?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well-led; Caring was not inspected and its previous comprehensive-inspection rating was carried forward. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Wilkinson Park

8 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.

  1. October 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Wilkinson Park

  2. September 2023Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. December 2020Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2020Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. February 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. August 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. May 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. September 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 September 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Careline Lifestyles (UK) Ltd

5 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Deneside Court

Jarrow, NE32
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 11 months agocare home

Orchard View

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3
Good
Nursing
Rated 17 months agocare home

Willow Park

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4
Not yet rated
Nursing
Not yet ratedcare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Morpeth

The Old Vicarage

Wooler, NE71 · 22.1 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 9 months agocare home

Beech Tree House

Alnwick, NE66 · 24.7 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home

Summerhill

Alnwick, NE66 · 24.8 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 16 months agocare home

Abbeyfield House

Alnwick, NE66 · 25.6 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 4 months agocare home