CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Interhaze
Wheatsheaf Court Care Home
44 Sheaf Street, Daventry, NN11 4AB
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. There were enough staff, medicines were managed safely, recruitment checks were completed and the home was clean.
- Effective?
- Requires improvement
- People did not always receive personalised support at mealtimes. Inspectors saw people left while being helped to eat, unsuitable equipment missing and support given at a pace that did not allow safe swallowing.
- Caring?
- Requires improvement
- Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
- Responsive?
- Requires improvement
- Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
- Well-led?
- Requires improvement
- The systems used to monitor and improve care were not effective enough. They had not identified or resolved continuing poor support at mealtimes, including missing equipment and cold meals.
What inspectors found, April 2024
Wheatsheaf Court Care Home is Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found safe care but continuing problems with mealtimes and oversight.
This was an unannounced inspection on 22 and 23 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and a health professional. They also reviewed care records, medicine records, quality checks and staff recruitment files.
The home was rated Good for Safe. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, appropriate medicine arrangements and systems to protect people from harm. The home was clean, and staff responded to accidents and incidents.
The home was rated Requires Improvement for Effective and Well-led. People did not always receive the individual support they needed at mealtimes. Inspectors found that checks and management systems had not fixed these problems. The home remains in breach of regulations 9 and 17.
Safety and medicines
Inspectors found that people received medicines as prescribed and that risks had been assessed. Staff had safeguarding and medicines training.
“The system for managing medicines ensured people were given the right dose at the right time.” from the report
Staffing
There were enough staff to meet people's needs during the inspection. The provider also completed recruitment checks, including references and DBS checks.
“There were enough staff to keep people safe.” from the report
Health support
People were supported to see health professionals when needed. Staff recorded health concerns and the action taken.
“People were supported by staff to access healthcare services when required.” from the report
Choice and consent
Staff asked for permission before providing day-to-day care and supported people to make their own decisions. The provider was working in line with the Mental Capacity Act.
“Throughout the inspection, we heard staff ask people for their permission when offering care and support” from the report
Mealtime support
seriousPeople did not always receive individual support that met their social and nutritional needs. Inspectors saw people left during meals, missing adaptive equipment and food being given too quickly.
“During an observation of the mealtime service we saw the lunch service was chaotic, people did not receive individualised support and their dignity was not protected.” from the report
Poor oversight
seriousManagement checks did not identify or correct continuing problems with mealtime care. Some people did not have the equipment they needed, and some meals were cold.
“The oversight and governance of the service was not effectively managed.” from the report
Staff practice and induction
needs fixingAlthough staff had received training, inspectors did not always see this reflected in practice. New and agency staff were sometimes shadowing workers who were not following good practice.
“New staff start off on the wrong foot because they are not shadowing staff who deliver care how it should be.” from the report
- 01What specific changes have been made to support each person safely and with dignity at mealtimes?
- 02How do you make sure plate guards, adaptive cutlery and other required equipment are available before meals?
- 03How do managers check that people are not left while being helped to eat?
- 04How are new and agency staff supervised so they learn good person-centred practice?
- 05What progress has been made on the action plan requested by the CQC?
This inspection checked whether previous legal requirements were being met and rated Safe, Effective and Well-led; ratings for Caring and Responsive were not given in this report. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 April 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Wheatsheaf Court Care Home
6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- April 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- May 2023Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- March 2022Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- September 2019Requires improvementup from InadequateSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2019Inadequatedown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- November 2017Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2015GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- April 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- April 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Interhaze Limited
6 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.