Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Underwood Hall

Wentworth Grange

Nursing Home, Riding Mill, NE44 6DZ

Goodpublished 15 September 2025, 11 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind, knowledgeable care but weaknesses in medicines records and oversight.

This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 23 October 2023. Inspectors looked at Safe and Well-led. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and external professionals, observed care, and checked care, medicines and management records.

The home was not always safe. Medicines guidance and records were inconsistent. Audits and investigations did not reliably identify problems or show lessons learned. Some information was also not shared promptly with CQC and other agencies.

There were positive findings. People felt safe and supported. Staff understood people's risks and needs, care plans were detailed, the environment was clean, and staff were trained and checked as competent. However, the weaknesses in oversight led to a breach of Regulation 17 and an overall rating of Requires Improvement.

What inspectors praised
  • Detailed care planning

    Care plans included useful information about people's needs and risks. Staff understood how to reduce those risks.

    Risk assessments were contained within people' care planning documentation and were detailed.from the report
  • Trained staff

    Staff received training and supervision, and their competence was checked regularly. They showed good knowledge of people's medicines and needs.

    Staff were trained, supervised and had their competence regularly assessed.from the report
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives said they felt safe and supported. Staff checked on people's wellbeing and responded promptly to individual incidents.

    People felt safe and supported. Staff regularly checked on people's wellbeing.from the report
  • Warm relationships

    Inspectors saw staff interact warmly with people. People valued the stable core staff team and continuity of care.

    Staff were welcoming and interacted warmly with people throughout.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines records and guidance

    needs fixing

    Guidance for medicines given when needed was not always person-centred. Records for creams and patches were inconsistent or missing on some occasions.

    Guidance to support staff in the safe administration of when required medicines needed to be more person-centred.from the report
  • Weak oversight

    serious

    Medicines and care plan audits were irregular or ineffective. They did not identify the problems found during the inspection.

    Audits of medicines were irregular and had not picked up on the areas we identified.from the report
  • Incident investigations

    serious

    Internal investigations did not always show clear lessons or follow-up actions. This meant the home could not demonstrate that repeat problems would be avoided.

    The provider did not always conduct sufficiently rigorous internal investigations following incidents; lessons learned and follow up actions were not always apparent.from the report
  • Delayed information sharing

    needs fixing

    Information and records were not always shared promptly with CQC and other relevant agencies. The report said the culture was not always open.

    The provider did not always share information promptly when requested, with CQC and other relevant agencies.from the report
  • Staffing concerns raised

    needs fixing

    Some people and external professionals felt there were times when staff were stretched in communal areas. Inspectors did not see staff struggling during the visit, but the provider agreed to review how staffing levels were calculated.

    People felt there were times when there were too few staff in communal areas.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have you made to guidance and records for medicines given when needed, creams and patches?
  2. 02How often are medicines and care plan audits now completed, and who checks that they identify problems?
  3. 03How do you investigate incidents and record the lessons learned and follow-up actions?
  4. 04How quickly will you share information and records with CQC and other agencies when requested?
  5. 05What has your review found about staffing levels in communal areas?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Wentworth Grange

4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.

  1. December 2023Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Wentworth Grange

  2. May 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. November 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. October 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Riding Mill

Burn Brae Lodge

Corbridge, NE45 · 3.2 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 5 years agocare home

Mountview

Stocksfield, NE43 · 3.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

New Ridley Road

Stocksfield, NE43 · 4.4 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Rose Tree House

Stocksfield, NE43 · 5.4 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 7 months agocare home