CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Majestic Care Home
Waterside Care Home
192 Queens Promenade, Bispham, Blackpool, FY2 9JS
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found care risk assessments, environmental checks, infection control measures and medicines systems were helping to protect people from harm. Staffing and recruitment checks were also considered adequate.
- Effective?
- Good
- This question was not rated in this inspection.
- Caring?
- Good
- This question was not rated in this inspection, although people told inspectors they were happy and felt consulted about their care.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This question was not rated in this inspection.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found good oversight of quality and safety. People and staff were consulted, and managers showed a wish to keep improving the home.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Waterside Care Home is rated Good; inspectors found people were safe, supported by staff and living in a well-managed home.
Inspectors visited without warning on 25 October 2023. They spoke with people, a relative, staff and the manager. They also checked the building, care and medicines records, staffing and recruitment files, and the systems used to monitor quality.
The home was rated Good overall. Safe was rated Good, improving from Requires Improvement at the last inspection. Inspectors found risk assessments, medicines checks, infection control and staffing arrangements were helping to keep people safe.
Well-led was rated Good, the same as at the last inspection. Inspectors found that managers checked the quality of care, listened to people and staff, and continued to make improvements.
Risk management
Care records contained risk assessments and staff monitored the environment to reduce risks. Inspectors also found evidence of learning to help prevent wounds.
“People's care records included risk assessments guiding staff to reduce the risk of inappropriate care.” from the report
Medicines safety
Senior staff were trained to give medicines safely, and their skills were checked. Records included information about doses, timing, purpose and possible side effects.
“The registered manager underpinned this with competency checks of their skills.” from the report
Staff availability
People and relatives said there were enough staff. Inspectors saw staff working in a calm and unhurried way.
“There always seems to be staff around, which makes me feel [my relative] is safe and well looked after.” from the report
Management oversight
Managers used audits and other checks to monitor quality and safety. People were consulted about their care and the home environment.
“The management team had good oversight of quality assurance to ensure everyone lived and worked in a safe environment.” from the report
Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.
- 01How will you review my relative's risk assessments as their needs change?
- 02How do you check that staff remain competent to give medicines safely?
- 03How do you make sure there are enough staff for my relative's individual needs at all times?
- 04What issues do your quality checks currently identify, and how quickly are they dealt with?
- 05How will my relative be involved in decisions about their care and the home environment?
This inspection rated Safe and Well-led only; the other three key questions were not rated in this report. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Waterside Care Home
4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- February 2022Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- October 2017Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Good
- April 2017Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: InadequateWell-led: Requires improvement
- January 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- September 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- June 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2012
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 February 2012.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.