Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Salutem Bid Co

Wallace Mews

230 Mowbray Road, South Shields, NE33 3BE

Goodpublished 15 February 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found detailed risk plans, safeguarding systems, enough staff and safe recruitment. They also found unlocked doors to areas containing cleaning materials, but the manager acted immediately to make this safe.
Effective?
Good
This area was not assessed during this focused inspection. Its previous rating was carried forward.
Caring?
Good
This area was not assessed during this focused inspection. Its previous rating was carried forward.
Responsive?
Good
This area was not assessed during this focused inspection. Its previous rating was carried forward.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found positive leadership, regular checks and an open culture. People, relatives, staff and professionals were involved and said managers were approachable.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Wallace Mews is rated Good; inspectors found safe, person-centred care, with some minor safety, medicines and training issues.

This was a focused inspection on 23 January 2024. One inspector spoke with three people, six staff, two relatives and two professionals. They also reviewed care records, medicines information and other documents.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found detailed risk plans, enough staff, safe recruitment and systems for safeguarding. People appeared happy and relaxed, and relatives and professionals said they felt people were safe.

There were some issues. Unlocked doors led to areas containing cleaning materials, although this was fixed during the inspection. There had also been minor medicines errors, some gaps in cleaning records and some statutory training below 80% completion.

This was not a full inspection of every area of care. The ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the previous comprehensive inspection in 2018. The overall rating remained Good.

What inspectors praised
  • Respectful, individual care

    Care records included people's preferences and choices. Inspectors found that staff respected people as individuals and supported their independence.

    People were supported in a way that respected them as individuals and their personal and cultural choices.from the report
  • Staffing and safeguarding

    Inspectors found enough suitable staff and safe recruitment checks. Staff understood safeguarding and relatives and professionals said people were safe.

    The provider ensured there were sufficient numbers of suitable staff.from the report
  • Positive atmosphere

    People appeared happy and relaxed with staff. Inspectors found a friendly, homely atmosphere and good relationships.

    There was a friendly and homely atmosphere at the service and people and staff enjoyed each other's company.from the report
  • Strong management

    The home had a clear management structure, regular checks and an open culture. Families and professionals were involved in people's care and activities.

    There was a positive and open culture at the service.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unlocked cleaning areas

    needs fixing

    Some doors to areas containing cleaning materials were unlocked, creating a potential hazard. The manager acted during the inspection to make the situation safe.

    We found a number of doors into areas where there were cleaning materials stored were unlocked.from the report
  • Previous medicines errors

    needs fixing

    There had been several minor medicines errors before the inspection. The home had provided refresher training and had recently introduced an electronic medicines records system.

    There had been a number of minor medicine errors at the home in the months prior to the inspection.from the report
  • Training completion

    needs fixing

    Most required training was completed, but some areas were below 80%. Ask the home which training areas were affected and how completion is being improved.

    The homes training record showed that most statutory training was well completed, although some areas were below 80% completion.from the report
  • Cleaning records

    minor

    Inspectors found minor gaps in cleaning records. The manager was told about these gaps.

    There were some minor gaps in cleaning records which we brought the attention of the registered manager.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What medicines errors happened before the inspection, and what has changed since the electronic medicines records system was introduced?
  2. 02How do you now make sure doors to areas containing cleaning materials stay locked?
  3. 03Which statutory training areas were below 80%, and when will all staff have completed them?
  4. 04How are cleaning records checked after the gaps identified by inspectors?
  5. 05How will you show that the care still meets people's individual choices and cultural needs?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the previous comprehensive inspection in 2018. This explanation was written from the published report of 15 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Wallace Mews

3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Wallace Mews

  2. July 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Pathways Care Group Limited

15 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Fairholme

South Shields, NE33
Good
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home

Famille House

Leicester, LE9
Good
Residential
Rated 16 months agocare home

Greenways

Pinner, HA5
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

Harmony House

Hebburn, NE31
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near South Shields

Wallace Lodge

South Shields, NE33 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Fairholme

South Shields, NE33 · 0.7 km
Good
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home

St Thomas Complex

South Shields, NE33 · 0.7 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home