Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Country Court Care

Walberton Place Care Home

Yapton Lane, Walberton, Arundel, BN18 0AS

Goodpublished 23 April 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found serious safety, safeguarding and leadership failures.

This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 11 October 2023. Four inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and health professionals. They observed care and checked care plans, medicines records, staff records, rotas, training and management records.

The home was rated Inadequate for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that risks were not consistently assessed or managed. Medicines records were unclear, infection control was not properly reviewed, and people were not always protected from improper treatment or neglect.

Staff did not always have the skills needed for people's needs. Management checks had failed to find or fix problems, and improvements had not been sustained. People and relatives did describe care staff as kind and caring, and recruitment checks were in place.

The previous rating was Requires Improvement, published in June 2023. The home had been rated Requires Improvement at the previous four inspections and was still in breach of regulations. It is now in special measures while CQC monitors whether significant improvements are made.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and caring staff

    People and relatives said care staff were kind and caring, although there were concerns about communication.

    People and their relatives told us the care staff were kind and caring but there were concerns about communication at the home.from the report
  • Recruitment checks

    The home had checks in place before staff were employed, including references and DBS checks.

    The provider had safe systems in place for recruiting staff.from the report
  • Mental capacity processes

    Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were recorded, and deprivation of liberty authorisations were monitored.

    The provider was working in line with the Mental Capacity Act.from the report
  • Visitors allowed

    People could receive visitors without restrictions, in line with the guidance referred to in the report.

    People were able to receive visitors without restrictions in line with best practice guidance.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Risks not managed

    serious

    Risk assessments and care plans did not always give staff the information needed to keep people safe. Inspectors observed unsafe support for a person at high risk of choking.

    The provider did not always assess risks to ensure people were safe.from the report
  • Medicines errors

    serious

    PRN instructions were not always followed, records were unclear, and medicine stock records contained errors. One person's pain relief was not recorded in their care plan or administration records.

    Some PRN protocols were not being consistently followed by staff and medicine administration record (MAR) charts were not clear.from the report
  • Safeguarding failures

    serious

    Inspectors raised safeguarding alerts for two people. Some incidents had not been identified or reported as possible safeguarding concerns, and staff could not always explain how they would recognise abuse.

    People were not always protected from abuse and improper treatment.from the report
  • Infection control

    serious

    During a COVID-19 outbreak, not all staff wore masks and some were unsure about personal protective equipment. The manager had not reviewed the infection control risk assessment or current guidance.

    People were not always protected from the risk of infection as staff were not consistently following safe infection prevention and control practicesfrom the report
  • Staff skills

    serious

    Staff did not always have the skills or confidence to manage people's needs, including allergies, falls, catheter care and additional support needs.

    The provider had not ensured all staff had the skills and competence to provide care safely.from the report
  • Weak oversight

    serious

    Audits did not identify inaccurate records, missing care information or medicine discrepancies. Repeated action plans had not reduced problems such as falls or embedded learning.

    There had been a continued failure to make, and sustain, improvements over time.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate changes have been made to risk assessments and care plans for choking, hydration, epilepsy, falls, dementia and end of life care?
  2. 02How are PRN medicines, pain relief, medicine stocks and MAR charts now checked for accuracy?
  3. 03What safeguarding concerns were identified, reported and investigated, and how will you prevent similar incidents?
  4. 04What training and competency checks have staff completed for the needs of people currently living in the home?
  5. 05What evidence can you show that audits and the improvement plan are now identifying problems and making changes that last?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried over from the previous inspection and used to calculate the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Walberton Place Care Home

4 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has slipped, from Requires improvement to Inadequate.

  1. February 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Walberton Place Care Home

  2. June 2023Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2022Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2019

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 October 2019.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Country Court Care Homes 2 Limited

18 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Birkin Lodge

Tunbridge Wells, TN2
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

Carter House

London, SW20
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Fenchurch House

Spalding, PE11
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Arundel

HF Trust Chestnuts

Bognor Regis, PO22 · 1.6 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

Warmere Court

Arundel, BN18 · 2.0 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

Abbey Dean

Bognor Regis, PO22 · 2.1 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated last monthcare home

Henson Court

Bognor Regis, PO22 · 2.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 8 months agocare home

Barnham Manor

Bognor Regis, PO22 · 2.2 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home