Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home

Turret Villa Retirement Home

Etal Road, Tweedmouth, Berwick-upon-Tweed, TD15 2EG

Requires improvementpublished 27 August 2025, 12 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found unsafe medicines management, gaps in risk checks and training, and weak quality monitoring.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 17 and 18 January 2024. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicines, staff and management records.

The home had enough staff, people were protected from abuse, the building was maintained, and people generally felt cared for. However, medicines were not always stored, recorded or disposed of safely. Risk-control actions were not always followed, and some staff training was out of date.

The home was rated Requires Improvement overall for the areas inspected: Safe, Effective and Well-led. The overall rating fell from Good at the previous inspection. Caring and Responsive were not inspected during this visit, so their previous ratings carried over.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe. People said staff responded when they used their call bells.

    There were enough staff on duty to care for people safely.from the report
  • Protection from abuse

    Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. Safeguarding incidents were investigated and reported to the relevant authorities.

    People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse.from the report
  • Healthcare support

    People could access healthcare services when needed. Staff made timely referrals and followed advice from healthcare professionals.

    People were supported to access healthcare services whenever they needed support.from the report
  • Supportive culture

    People enjoyed living at the home and felt listened to. Staff described the management team as supportive.

    There was a positive culture in the service. Staff said the management team were supportive.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines were not consistently safe

    serious

    Some medicines were insecure, out of date or not disposed of promptly. Stock records were wrong, and medicines audits were incomplete.

    Medicines were not always managed safely. Medicines were not always stored appropriately or disposed of safely.from the report
  • Risk actions were missed

    serious

    Some planned actions to reduce risks were not happening or were not recorded. This included weighing people at risk of malnutrition and repositioning someone at risk of pressure sores.

    People had assessments in place which included actions to reduce risks, but the actions were not taking place.from the report
  • Training was out of date

    serious

    Several staff were overdue training in areas including safeguarding, medicines, fire safety and end-of-life care. The training policy was also out of date.

    Multiple staff members were out of date for training courses including safeguarding, medicines, health and safety, fire safety, end of life and learning disabilities training.from the report
  • Consent records were incomplete

    serious

    Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not always recorded for restrictions such as movement sensors or wheelchair restraints.

    Mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were not always in place.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to medicine storage, controlled drugs, stock checks, disposal and staff competency checks?
  2. 02How are you now making sure weekly weights, food and fluid monitoring, and repositioning plans are completed and reviewed?
  3. 03Which staff training is now up to date, especially medicines, safeguarding, fire safety and end-of-life care?
  4. 04How are mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions recorded for movement sensors, wheelchair restraints and other restrictions?
  5. 05How will your quality checks show that incidents, medicines problems and care-plan issues are identified and corrected?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings carried over. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Turret Villa Retirement Home

5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. February 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Turret Villa Retirement Home

  2. August 2020Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2015Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. February 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 18 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Berwick-upon-Tweed

Tweedmouth House

Berwick-upon-Tweed, TD15 · 0.8 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Garden House

Berwick-upon-Tweed, TD15 · 1.2 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated last monthcare home

Tweed View House

Berwick-upon-Tweed, TD15 · 1.3 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

Albury House

Berwick-upon-Tweed, TD15 · 1.3 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 14 months agoReport explained

La Cura House

Berwick-upon-Tweed, TD15 · 2.0 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home