Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Humberside Independent Care Association

The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing

Buckshaw Retirement Village, Oakbridge Drive, Buckshaw Village, Chorley, PR7 7EP

Goodpublished 15 October 2025, 10 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing is rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind care and enough staff, but medicines and management checks were not consistently safe.

This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 13 December 2023. Inspectors reviewed information from before the visit, spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care plans, risk assessments, medicines records, audits, rotas and recruitment files.

The home was clean and comfortable, with enough staff and safe recruitment. Staff were trained, worked with health professionals and supported people with food, drink, dementia care and decision-making. Relatives described staff as caring.

However, medicines were not always stored or recorded safely. Management audits had failed to find these problems, including issues that had also been found before. The home breached regulations on safe care and treatment and good governance. The overall rating stayed Requires Improvement. Effective improved to Good, while Safe and Well-led remained Requires Improvement.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Recruitment checks, including references and DBS checks, had been completed.

    People were supported by enough staff who had been recruited safely.from the report
  • Skilled and supported staff

    Staff had relevant training, a proper induction and regular supervision and team meetings.

    The registered manager provided a robust induction and staff training was up to date in relevant areas.from the report
  • Health and nutrition support

    Staff worked with health and community services. People were supported with balanced meals, modified diets and referrals to dieticians and speech and language therapy.

    Staff worked with other agencies to provide care and supported people to live healthier lives.from the report
  • Kind atmosphere

    Relatives described staff as kind and caring. Inspectors found a positive culture and staff who were committed to care.

    Staff are very kind and caring, I am happy with the staff.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine records and storage

    serious

    Medicine fridge and room temperature records had gaps. Thickener was not always recorded or stored securely, and a controlled-drugs cupboard key was left on top of the cupboard.

    Systems had not been established to make sure medicines were managed safely. This placed people at risk of harm.from the report
  • Management checks missed problems

    serious

    The medicine audit did not identify the issues inspectors found. The same concern had also been identified at the previous inspection.

    Although there was a schedule of audits, the medicine's audit had not identified the issues we found during the inspection in order to make changes.from the report
  • Limited guidance on safe holds

    needs fixing

    Some care plans referred to safe holds but did not give enough person-specific information to guide staff. CQC recommended getting guidance on how to document these care strategies.

    We recommend the provider seek guidance about how to document information regarding care strategies, so they are specific for each person.from the report
  • Infection control practice

    minor

    Some staff did not follow the home's bare-below-the-elbow policy. The manager said this would be addressed immediately.

    We observed that some staff did not adhere to the service's 'bare below the elbow' policy.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What specific changes have been made to medicine fridge and room temperature checks, and how are missed checks now followed up?
  2. 02How do you make sure staff record the amount of thickener added to drinks and store thickener securely?
  3. 03What guidance is now available for staff administering medicines prescribed as and when required?
  4. 04How are medicine audits being checked to make sure they identify problems before they put people at risk?
  5. 05What person-specific guidance is now recorded for anyone supported with safe holds?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected, and the overall rating used the previous ratings for questions not inspected. This explanation was written from the published report of 7 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing

5 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.

  1. February 2024Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing

  2. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. June 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. August 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2015

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. August 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. April 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. August 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. August 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  15. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Chorley