Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by BUPA Group

The Lindsay

47a Lindsay Road, Poole, BH13 6AP

Goodpublished 2 August 2025, 12 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found the home safe, but staffing, consent checks and management oversight needed improvement.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 11 and 12 October 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and health professionals. They reviewed care records, medicine records, staff files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe. People generally felt safe, medicines were managed safely, risks were assessed, and staff understood safeguarding. However, some people waited too long for call bells to be answered because there were not always enough staff.

Effective and Well-led were both rated Requires Improvement. Inspectors found gaps in mental capacity assessments and consent records, inconsistent oral care, missed staff supervisions and management checks that had not identified these problems.

The overall rating changed from Good at the previous inspection to Requires Improvement. The manager took immediate action during the inspection, but inspectors will check whether the changes have worked at the next inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives generally said the home was safe and that people were well looked after.

    People told us they felt safe living at the home.from the report
  • Medicines were managed safely

    Staff had the right training and checks to give medicines safely. Records matched the medicines held.

    Medication records were complete and matched stock balances.from the report
  • Staff training

    The home provided induction and ongoing training. Inspectors found staff had the skills and knowledge needed for their roles.

    Staff had the correct level of skills and training to undertake the responsibilities of their role effectively.from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw staff treating people with dignity and respect. Relatives also gave positive feedback about how they and their relatives were treated.

    There was a positive culture within the home. Staff interacted with people in a kind and considerate manner, treating them with dignity and respect.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staffing and call bell waits

    serious

    There were not always enough staff to meet people's needs. Some people reported waiting a long time for call bells to be answered.

    People told us staffing levels did not always meet their needs.from the report
  • Mental capacity and consent records

    serious

    Some people did not have the required capacity assessments, and care plans contained conflicting information. People had not always signed records to show they consented to their care.

    People did not always have the necessary assessments in place to ensure their rights had been fully respected under the MCA.from the report
  • Oral care

    needs fixing

    The home's oral care policy was not always followed. Some people were not consistently supported with teeth cleaning or routine dental appointments.

    [Staff] don't clean my teeth always and it makes you feel a bit rubbishfrom the report
  • Management checks

    needs fixing

    Audits and other checks did not identify several of the problems found by inspectors. The provider was asked to strengthen its governance systems.

    Quality assurance systems in place to monitor and improve the standard of the service were not always robust.from the report
  • Staff supervision and morale

    needs fixing

    Some staff had not received supervision as required by the home's policy. Frequent changes in managers had contributed to low staff morale.

    Some staff had not received supervision as specified in the provider's supervision policy, due to recent changes in the management of the service.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are staffing levels now calculated for each shift, and what has been done to reduce call bell waiting times?
  2. 02How do you check that every person's mental capacity assessment and consent records are correct and up to date?
  3. 03How do you make sure each person receives the oral care set out in their care plan and policy?
  4. 04How often are staff supervisions now completed, and how is staff morale being monitored?
  5. 05What new audits or management checks have been introduced, and how will you show that they are finding and fixing problems?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their current ratings were not given in this report. This explanation was written from the published report of 15 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Lindsay

2 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. December 2023Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at The Lindsay

  2. March 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. August 2017Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2016

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 3 February 2016.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

St Cecilia

Poole, BH12 · 0.3 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 10 months agocare home

Canford Chase

Poole, BH13 · 0.7 km
Outstanding
Nursing
Rated 7 years agocare home

Branksome Heights

Bournemouth, BH4 · 0.7 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 13 months agocare home