Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Mrs M Mitchell

The Laurels

43 Salisbury Road, Harrow, HA1 1NU

Goodpublished 26 September 2023, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough suitable staff, good safeguarding systems, appropriate risk assessments and safe medicines procedures. Infection prevention and control arrangements were also effective.
Effective?
Good
People's needs were assessed and care plans were personalised and reviewed. Staff were trained, people received suitable food and drink, and the home worked with health and social care professionals.
Caring?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this visit, so the report does not give a current rating for caring.
Responsive?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this visit, so the report does not give a current rating for responsive care.
Well-led?
Good
The manager was involved in the day-to-day running of the home and used audits, feedback and staff discussions to monitor and improve the service.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2023

The Laurels is rated Good; inspectors found safe, effective and well-managed care, with caring and responsive care not assessed at this visit.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 12 and 13 September 2023. One inspector spoke with people living in the home, relatives, the manager and care workers. They also checked care records, staff files, training records, incidents, environmental checks and quality monitoring.

The home was rated Good overall. Safe, effective and well-led were each rated Good. Inspectors found enough trained staff, safe medicines systems, suitable risk assessments and good infection control. The home was clean, maintained and homely.

People's care was personalised and staff worked with health and social care professionals. Inspectors also found that the manager monitored the service, listened to feedback and acted on issues. The overall rating remained Good, as it was at the previous inspection published in November 2018.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough skilled staff

    Inspectors found enough experienced staff who knew people well. People did not have to wait for care, and staff were seen to be attentive.

    The service had enough suitably qualified, competent, skilled and experienced staff.from the report
  • Safe medicines and infection control

    Staff were trained and checked as competent to give medicines. Inspectors also found effective infection prevention arrangements and access to protective equipment.

    The service used effective infection, prevention and control measures to keep people safe, and care workers supported people to follow them.from the report
  • Personalised support

    People's needs were assessed before they moved in, and their care plans covered their physical and mental health needs. Plans were reviewed with people, relatives and staff.

    People had care and support plans that were personalised, holistic, strengths-based and reflected their needs, including physical and mental health needs.from the report
  • Active management

    The manager was involved in daily life at the home and had systems to check medicines, health and safety, the environment and infection control. Feedback was used to develop the service.

    The manager had systems to monitor and assess the service provided to people.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you assess and respond to my relative's specific risks, such as falls, choking, poor eating or moving and handling?
  2. 02How do you check that staff remain competent to administer my relative's medicines?
  3. 03What training and supervision will the staff caring for my relative receive?
  4. 04How will my relative's care plan be reviewed with us, and how will you record the outcomes they want?
  5. 05How will you support visits and family involvement in day-to-day care?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected at this visit, and ratings for questions not inspected were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Laurels

3 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. September 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at The Laurels

  2. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. December 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. August 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 7 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Harrow

79 Harrow View

Harrow, HA1 · 0.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Ashgale House

Harrow, HA1 · 0.5 km
Good
Residential
Rated 5 years agocare home