Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Jiva Healthcare

The Highviews

47 Saltdean Drive, Saltdean, Brighton, BN2 8SD

Goodpublished 23 April 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2023

Requires Improvement; the home is no longer in special measures after progress from an inadequate rating, but some safety, responsiveness and leadership improvements were not yet embedded.

This was a focused inspection on 25 July 2023. One inspector spoke with five people, observed care, spoke with managers and staff, and checked care and management records. The inspection focused on Safe, Responsive and Well-led.

Inspectors found clear improvements since the previous inspection. Staffing was better, people had more opportunities to go out, care was more personalised, and new systems for risks, incidents and management checks were in place.

The improvements were still new and had not been fully sustained. Some night staff were not trained to give as-needed medicines, recruitment still needed attention, and records and care planning needed further development. The overall rating changed from Inadequate to Requires Improvement, and the home left special measures.

What inspectors praised
  • Improved staffing

    The home had enough staff, including one-to-one support for activities and community visits. People and staff said the extra staffing had improved quality of life.

    The service had enough staff, including one-to-one support for people to take part in activities and visits out in the community.from the report
  • More community activities

    People had more chances to go out and take part in activities they chose, including arts and crafts and local trips.

    We observed people were being supported with activities they had chosen including arts and crafts as well as being supported with trips out in the local community.from the report
  • Better risk management

    Risk assessments and care plans had improved. Staff followed advice about eating and drinking risks, and environmental safety arrangements had also improved.

    Risks to people were identified and assessed. Care and support plans provided guidance for staff in how to support people safely to mitigate risks.from the report
  • People involved in decisions

    People were involved in service meetings and decisions about activities and the home. A concern about the lounge television was acted on.

    Notes from meetings showed how people were engaged. For example, people were encouraged to take turns to chair the meetings.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Night-time medicines training

    serious

    Not all night staff had been trained and assessed as competent to administer as-needed medicines. A temporary arrangement was being used while new staff were trained.

    Staff who worked at night had not all been trained and assessed as competent in administering medicines.from the report
  • Improvements not yet lasting

    needs fixing

    The new systems and changes had not yet been shown to be fully embedded and sustained. This affected safety, personalised care and management oversight.

    Systems for assessing and managing risks were not yet fully embedded and sustained.from the report
  • Recruitment still needs attention

    needs fixing

    Although staffing levels had improved, the provider was still recruiting to make sure suitable staffing levels could be maintained over time.

    The provider continued to recruit new staff. This remains an area of practice that needs to improve to ensure that suitable staffing levels are sustained over time.from the report
  • End-of-life planning unfinished

    minor

    Some people had information about their wishes, but the manager described improvements to end-of-life care plans as work in progress.

    The registered manager described this as work in progress and plans to improve end of life care plans were included on the service improvement plan.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Have all night staff now been trained and assessed as competent to administer as-needed medicines?
  2. 02How are you checking that staffing levels remain safe when staff leave or recruitment takes time?
  3. 03How will you show that the new risk, care planning and management systems are fully embedded and sustained?
  4. 04What changes have been made to people's end-of-life care plans since the inspection?
  5. 05What opportunities will my relative have to choose activities and go out into the local community?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Responsive and Well-led; Effective and Caring were not inspected and their previous ratings were used in calculating the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 31 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Highviews

4 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. August 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at The Highviews

  2. June 2023Inadequatedown from Good
    Safe: InadequateResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  4. August 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  5. December 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 2 December 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Jiva Healthcare Limited

3 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Good
Residential
Rated 2 years agoReport explained

Cornfield House

Seaford, BN25
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

The Seagulls

Brighton, BN2
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Brighton

The Lustrells

Brighton, BN2 · 0.1 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Lustrells Vale

Brighton, BN2 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

The Whitehouse

Brighton, BN2 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

The Seagulls

Brighton, BN2 · 0.7 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home